聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

姑蘇志

9 min read

Text ID
KR2k0029
Date
1505–1506
Dynasty
明

Gūsū zhì 姑蘇志

Gazetteer of Gūsū (Sūzhōu) by 王鏊

About the work

A 60-juan Míng prefectural gazetteer of Sūzhōufǔ 蘇州府 (the Wújùn 吳郡 of antiquity, modern Sūzhōu in Jiāngsū), edited and brought to completion by Wáng Áo 王鏊 (1450–1524, zì Jǐzhī 濟之, hào Shǒuxī 守溪 / Zhènzé xiānshēng 震澤先生; jìnshì of Chénghuà 11 = 1475, posthumous title Wénkè 文恪) at the end of his service as Lìbù yòu shìláng and Guóshǐ fùzǒngcái (Vice Minister of Personnel and Vice Editor-in-Chief of National History) in 1505–06. The work continues a long Wújùn / Sūzhōu gazetteer tradition (Sòng Wújùn zhì by Fàn Chéngdà 范成大 KR2k0009; Hóngwǔ-era Sūzhōu fǔzhì in 50 juan by Lú Xióng 盧熊, 1379), but is the first comprehensive Sūzhōu gazetteer in over 130 years and supersedes earlier abandoned drafts. The actual editorial labor was carried out by a team of eight Sūzhōu literati — Dù Qǐ 杜啟, Zhù Yǔnmíng 祝允明 (the Wú-school calligrapher and writer, 1461–1527), Cài Yǔ 蔡羽, Wén Bì 文璧 / Wén Zhēngmíng 文徵明 (1470–1559), and others — under Wáng Áo’s overall direction. Compilation took eight months; the work was presented in the second month of Zhèngdé 1 (March 1506).

Tiyao

We respectfully note: the Gūsū zhì in 60 juan is by Wáng Áo 王鏊 of the Míng. Áo’s Zhènzé jìwén 震澤紀聞 and Zhènzé jí 震澤集 are listed separately. Sūzhōu, since the Sòng Wújùn zhì of Fàn Chéngdà 范成大 and the early-Míng [Hóngwǔ] gazetteer of Lú Xióng 盧熊, had long lacked a complete prefectural compilation. In the Hóngzhì era, Wú Kuān 吳寬 had together with Zhāng Xí 張習 and Dōu Mù 都穆 begun a revision, but did not finish it before his death; the surviving draft was preserved. Later, when the Cantonese Lín Shìyuǎn 林世遠 became prefect of Sūzhōu, he entrusted the matter to Áo. Áo then together with the men of his prefecture — Dù Qǐ 杜啟, Zhù Yǔnmíng 祝允明, Cài Yǔ 蔡羽, Wén Bì 文璧 (Wén Zhēngmíng) and others — together discussed and set the fánlì and rubrics, all rooted in [Wú] Kuān’s earlier draft, but cutting verbosity, correcting errors, and adding much new material. In eight months the book was complete. At the head are three tables: yángé 沿革, shǒulìng 守令 (prefects), and kēdì 科第 (examination success). After yángé and fēnyě 分野 (astronomical correspondence) the work is divided into 31 categories, and within the rénwù 人物 category there are 13 sub-headings. The level of detail is well-balanced, the evidential investigation careful — among gazetteers, one of those with proper structure.

Chén Jìrú’s 陳繼儒 Jiànwén lù 見聞錄 reports that when Áo was compiling the gazetteer, because Yáng Xúnjí 揚循吉 was fond of inventing scandalous rumors, he was unwilling to be in the same editorial bureau with him. When the book was complete, he sent it by messenger to Yáng. Yáng was just then washing and combing his hair and had no leisure to inspect it; he merely glanced at the title-slip and said “Doesn’t fit, doesn’t fit” (bù tōng bù tōng 不通不通). The messenger returned and reported this; Áo asked him about it. Yáng said: “The prefectural gazetteer was compiled in our dynasty; it ought properly to be titled with the name ‘Sūzhōu’. Gūsū is the name of King Wú’s terrace — how can a gazetteer be titled with it?” Áo then was greatly impressed.

But Áo’s own preface records that at the early stage of the work, there was a moment when they intended to entrust it to a Yáng of the Ministry of Rites (Yáng Yíbù 楊儀部) — and the Yíbù declined; that is, Áo did not in fact reject Yáng Xúnjí from participation. What Chén Jìrú records is therefore unlikely to be true. Furthermore, Fàn Chéngdà’s original work was already titled Wújùn zhì — it did not adopt the Sòng-period prefectural-name. Áo was in fact following the same precedent, and we cannot fault him on this score.

Reverently collated and submitted, tenth month, Qiánlóng 45 (1780). Editors-in-chief: Jì Yún 紀昀, Lù Xīxióng 陸錫熊, Sūn Shìyì 孫士毅. General collation officer: Lù Fèichí 陸費墀.

Abstract

The Gūsū zhì is the principal Míng prefectural gazetteer of Sūzhōu and one of the most accomplished gazetteer compilations of the late Hóngzhì–early Zhèngdé era. The compilation history, recovered from Wáng Áo’s yuánxù (preface dated Zhèngdé jìyuán èryuè zhī jí = the auspicious day of the second month of Zhèngdé 1 = March 1506), is unusually well-documented. Earlier abortive efforts under successive Sūzhōu prefects (Qiū Jì 丘霽 / Chénghuà 10 = 1474; Shǐ Jiǎn 史簡 and Cáo Fèng 曹鳳 / Hóngzhì era) had stalled, with the most substantial labor carried out by Wú Kuān 吳寬 (1435–1504, zì Yuánbó 原博, hào Páo’ān 匏菴, jìnshì of Chénghuà 8 / 1472, posthumous title Wéndìng 文定), the Hànlín-academy senior who continued his editorial work even during illness (“though sick at home, he never released the brush — light-ink fine-script writings filled boxes and tables”). When Wú Kuān died in 1504, the work was unfinished. The new prefect Lín Shìyuǎn 林世遠 (a Cantonese, jìnshì; arrived in Sūzhōu via the imperial jìnshì circuit) inherited the draft and entrusted it to Wáng Áo, who initially demurred, suggesting Yáng Xúnjí 楊循吉 (a Sūzhōu-native Hànlín scholar) instead; Yáng declined firmly. Wáng then took up the work in collaboration with seven local literati: Dù Qǐ, Zhù Yǔnmíng (the great calligrapher), Cài Yǔ, Wén Zhēngmíng (then named Wén Bì), and three others. Eight months of intensive editorial work produced 60 juan, completed and presented to Lín in early 1506. The fánlì followed Wú Kuān’s earlier draft scheme; the new editorial labor consisted in “gathering what was lost, opening up what was hidden, cutting redundancy, and correcting errors.”

The structure (60 juan): three tables at the head — Yángé biǎo 沿革表 (administrative evolution), Shǒulìng biǎo 守令表 (prefects), Kēdì biǎo 科第表 (examination roster) — followed by 31 thematic categories from yángé and fēnyě through shānchuān, fēngsú, chéngyì, gōngshǔ, xuéxiào, císì, mínghuàn, rénwù (with thirteen sub-categories: míngchén, rúlín, wényì, liángtì, zhōngyì, xiàoyǒu, gāoxíng, yǐnyì, liènǚ, fāngjì, etc.), through to cíwén and miscellaneous topics.

The Sìkù tíyào defends Wáng Áo against the charge — recorded by Chén Jìrú — that he had improperly excluded Yáng Xúnjí from the editorial team and had improperly titled the work Gūsū instead of Sūzhōu: Wáng’s own preface shows that Yáng was offered participation and declined; and the Sòng Wújùn zhì by Fàn Chéngdà had likewise used a literary-historical name (Wújùn) rather than the contemporary administrative name. The “Gūsū” title preserves the literary connection to the Wú king’s terrace and to the Yǔgòng / ZhōuLǐ tradition.

The work is the principal documentary source for: (a) the late Sòng – Yuán – Míng administrative and demographic history of the Sūzhōu region; (b) the Wú-school of painting, calligraphy, and literature (Zhù Yǔnmíng, Wén Zhēngmíng, and Wáng Áo himself were the central figures of the Wú-school cultural circle of the early sixteenth century, and the gazetteer is in part a self-document of that movement); (c) the local elite prosopography of one of the wealthiest and most culturally productive prefectures of late imperial China.

A note on dating: the catalog meta gives Wáng Áo’s lifedates 1450–1524. Compilation began in 1505 (the fù of the 105 ?–1506 — eight months from project to completion), with the yuánxù dated the second month of Zhèngdé 1 (March 1506). notBefore is 1505, notAfter 1506.

Translations and research

  • Goodrich, L. Carrington, and Chao-ying Fang, eds. Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368–1644. Columbia University Press, 1976. Vol. 2, 1343–47 (Wáng Áo entry by Chao-ying Fang). The standard English-language biographical entry; treats the Gūsū zhì as Wáng’s principal gazetteer-historical contribution.
  • Marmé, Michael. Suzhou: Where the Goods of All the Provinces Converge. Stanford University Press, 2005. The principal English-language history of late-Míng Sūzhōu; uses the Gūsū zhì as a foundational primary source.
  • Clunas, Craig. Elegant Debts: The Social Art of Wen Zhengming, 1470–1559. London: Reaktion, 2004. Treats Wén Zhēngmíng’s editorial work on the Gūsū zhì in the context of the Wú-school cultural network.
  • Hargett, James M. 1996. “Song dynasty local gazetteers and their place in the history of difangzhi writing.” HJAS 56.2: 405–42. For the Sūzhōu gazetteer lineage from Fàn Chéngdà forward.
  • Wilkinson, Endymion. Chinese History: A New Manual. 6th ed. 2022. §§16.4.1, 65.3.3.1.
  • Modern punctuated editions: in Sìkù quánshū zhēnběn and in the Shànghǎi Gǔjí Sūzhōu local-history series; the standard recent edition is Gūsū zhì (Sūzhōu: Sūzhōu dàxué chūbǎnshè, 2013).
  • Chén Jìrú’s 陳繼儒 Jiànwén lù 見聞錄 (Wàn-lì era) preserves the (likely apocryphal) anecdote about Yáng Xúnjí; the Sìkù tíyào refutes its accuracy.

Other points of interest

The Gūsū zhì is one of the few major Míng prefectural gazetteers that can be directly linked to the central Wú-school cultural movement: Zhù Yǔnmíng and Wén Zhēngmíng (the latter then in his mid-thirties) were both directly involved in the editorial work, and Wáng Áo himself was the senior patron of that generation. The work therefore has a documentary value for the cultural history of early-sixteenth-century Sūzhōu that exceeds its functional role as an administrative gazetteer. Wén Zhēngmíng’s editorial style — close attention to the precise phrasing of literary excerpts and to the calligraphic quality of stele citations — can be felt particularly in the cíwén and jīnshí sections.

Graph View

Backlinks