聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

金石文考略

4 min read

Text ID
KR2n0042
Date
1729–1729
Dynasty
清

Jīnshí wén kǎolüè 金石文考略

Brief Investigations of the Inscriptions in Bronze and Stone

by 李光暎 (Lǐ Guāngyīng, fl. 1729)

About the work

A 16-juan compendium of jīnshí inscriptions and their critical apparatus, compiled by Lǐ Guāngyīng of Jiāxīng (the work is also known by Lǐ’s studio name Guānmiàozhāi 觀妙齋, hence the Zinbun’s 觀妙齋金石文考略). Jiāxīng was a major centre of late-Míng-early-Qing jīnshí collecting, with Cáo Róng 曹溶’s Gǔlín jīnshí biǎo 古林金石表 and Zhū Yízūn’s planned Jíjīn zhēnshí zhì 吉金貞石志 (left unfinished) as predecessors. Zhū’s actual collection passed to Lǐ, who built on this foundation. The work draws on 40 jīnshí compilations and 60+ wénjí, dìfāng zhì (gazetteers), and shuōbù (miscellaneous works) — a synthesis of secondary literature unprecedented in scale. The Sìkù editors note the work omits Zhāng Tóng 張弨’s Yìhèmíng 瘞鶴銘 transcription, Zhōu Zàijùn 周在浚’s Tiānfāshénchèn bēi transcription, and Yú Sōng’s Lántíng xùkǎo KR2n0023 — minor lacunae in an otherwise comprehensive treatment. Each entry’s references are noted, on Chén Sī’s Bǎokè cóngbiān KR2n0024 model. The work’s emphasis is calligraphic-aesthetic (pǐnpíng shūjì) — for Hàn lì it follows Zhèng Pǔ 鄭簠; for Tang bēi it follows Zhào Hán KR2n0033’s judgments — rather than historical-evidential.

Tiyao

[Translated from the Sìkù tíyào, condensed]

Compiled by Lǐ Guāngyīng of the present (Qing) dynasty. Guāngyīng, zì Zǐzhōng, of Jiāxīng. Jiāxīng jīnshí connoisseurs: predecessor Cáo Róng’s Gǔlín jīnshí biǎo; successor Zhū Yízūn’s Jíjīn zhēnshí zhì. Zhū’s collected jīnshí rubbings then passed to Lǐ; he gathered what he had, collected the various critical views, and made this book. Jīn Jièfù wrote the preface, dated Yōngzhèng 7 (1729): “the richness is no less than Cáo’s Gǔlín.”

But Cáo’s Jīnshí biǎo has occasional irregularities, and lacks discussion; this book is more orderly. Zhū’s Jíjīn zhēnshí zhì never had a finished compilation; some doubt that Zhū had ever finished it. But this book has one quote labelled “Jíjīn zhēnshí zhì says…”, so perhaps a small fraction of Zhū’s draft survived.

The jīnshí-books drawn on are 40; the wénjí dìzhì shuōbù drawn on are 60. Diligent and broad. But for the Yìhèmíng he does not quote Zhāng Tóng’s transcription; for the Tiānfāshénchèn bēi he does not quote Zhōu Zàijùn’s; for the Lántíng xù he does not quote Yú Sōng’s Xùkǎo — these are lapses.

The earlier jīnshí recorders all worked from their own seeing-and-hearing. Only Sòng Chén Sī’s Bǎokè cóngbiān gathers from Jīnshí lù, Fùzhāi suìlù and others — a synthesis. This book is in that mould, with each entry’s citations noted under it. Where Lǐ has his own zìshí (own-knowledge) opinion, that is one in ten.

The richest jīnshí recordings are Ōuyáng, Zhào, Hóng three families; this work draws on Hóng’s Lìshì less than 1/10. From the Jígǔ and Jīnshí lù it draws less than fully; the Lìxù and Lóu Jī’s Hànlì zìyuán it does not draw on at all. These recorders treated history; this book aims at calligraphic-aesthetic appreciation. For Hàn lì, it follows Zhèng Pǔ; for Tang stele, it follows Zhào Hán. Although the same jīnshí genre, the editorial purpose is distinct.

Abstract

The Jīnshí wén kǎolüè is the principal Yōngzhèng-era Jiāngnán jīnshí compendium and the third-generation Jiāxīng-area jīnshí synthesis (after Cáo Róng’s and Zhū Yízūn’s). The catalog meta dates “fl. 1729” matches Jīn Jièfù’s preface; set notBefore 1729 / notAfter 1729 here.

The work’s contributions:

  1. Comprehensive bibliographic synthesis. 40 jīnshí + 60 wénjí-zhìshuō works drawn on — the largest pre-modern Chinese jīnshí-secondary-literature synthesis.
  2. Zhū Yízūn drafts preserved. A unique fragment (“the Jíjīn zhēnshí zhì says…”) of Zhū Yízūn’s never-printed draft is preserved here.
  3. Aesthetic vs. evidential focus. The work’s calligraphic-aesthetic emphasis — Zhèng Pǔ for Hàn lì, Zhào Hán for Tang stelae — represents the Jiāxīng-area jīnshí school’s distinctive orientation.

CBDB has no entry for Lǐ Guāngyīng.

Translations and research

No English translation. Studies:

  • Lǐ Yùhuá 李玉華 et al. on Jiāxīng jīnshí tradition.
  • Robert E. Harrist Jr., The Landscape of Words (Washington UP, 2008).
  • Yáng Rénkǎi 楊仁愷, Zhōngguó shūhuà 中國書畫.

Other points of interest

The Cáo Róng → Zhū Yízūn → Lǐ Guāngyīng generational sequence in Jiāxīng jīnshí makes a coherent Qing scholarly lineage; their successive collections and compilations represent the most stable continuous jīnshí practice in the Jiāngnán regional culture. The Guānmiàozhāi studio name — taken from the Lǎozǐ phrase “guān qí miào” 觀其妙 — also signals the calligraphic-aesthetic rather than evidentialist orientation.

Graph View

Backlinks