聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

成王為城濮之行

5 min read

Text ID
KR2p0082
Date
-350–-250
Dynasty
戰國

Chéngwáng Wéi Chéngpǔ Zhī Xíng 成王為城濮之行

King Cheng Prepares the Chengpu Expedition (modern editorial title)

(anonymous; excavated bamboo manuscript, no attributable author)

About the work

Chéngwáng Wéi Chéngpǔ Zhī Xíng 成王為城濮之行 is a historical narrative preserved on approximately 9 bamboo strips from the Shanghai Museum corpus of Warring States Chǔ 楚 manuscripts, published in 馬承源 Mǎ Chéngyuán ed., 《上海博物館藏戰國楚竹書》 vol. 9, Shànghǎi gǔjí chūbǎnshè 上海古籍出版社, 2012. It recounts events preceding the Battle of Chéngpǔ 城濮之戰 (632 BCE), in which the state of Jìn 晉 defeated Chǔ — one of the most celebrated and analyzed battles of the Spring and Autumn period. The text offers a Chǔ-internal perspective on military leadership, comparing the generalship of Zǐwén 子文 (Dòu Gǔyú 鬥穀於菟) and Zǐyù 子玉 (Chéng Dé 成得臣).

Abstract

The text is structured in two interlocking groups of slips (labeled 甲/乙 in the CHANT transcription, indicating multiple bamboo strip bundles or sequences). The narrative opens: “King Cheng [of Chǔ] prepared the Chengpu expedition (成王為城濮之行). The king ordered Zǐwén to inspect [xiào 校 = array/review] Zǐyù [and the army].”

Zǐwén’s and Zǐyù’s military reviews. Zǐwén arrays the army at an unnamed location in one day (yī rì ér bì 一日而畢) without executing a single man (bù sì yī rén 不肆一人). Zǐyù arrays the army at Wèi 蒍 (a Chǔ place-name) in three days (sān rì ér bì 三日而畢) and executes three men (zhǎn sān rén 斬三人). This contrast — efficiency and clemency versus slowness and severity — is the pivot of the narrative.

The banquet episode. The whole state celebrates Zǐwén’s military achievement. The king returns and hosts Zǐwén as a guest; the whole state (hé bāng 合邦) feasts and drinks. At the banquet, the young Wèi Bó Yíng 蒍伯嬴 (described as still immature, yóu yuē 猶約, still young) attends. Zǐwén raises a toast to Bó Yíng and addresses him: “I, Gù Yú Tú (穀於菟, Zǐwén’s birth name) am old and the senior of the Chǔ state; the king has pardoned my crime; [but it was only] because Zǐyù had not yet come into his own (wèi guàn 未貫) that the king ordered me to array the army in one day without executing anyone. Zǐyù arrayed [at Wèi] in three days and executed three men; the king hosted me as a guest; the whole state celebrated me — but you alone have not come to eat with me. Is this not being abandoned by Heaven, forgetting the heart of an old man?”

Bó Yíng’s reply. The young Wèi Bó Yíng responds: “The king said Zǐyù had not yet come into his own (wèi guàn 未貫). Now [Zǐyù] has already lost the army (jì bài shī 既敗師). You are the Chǔ senior; you rejoiced at your own excellence but did not restrain (zhì 制) Zǐyù’s army. The king ordered you to inspect it [precisely for this]; you completed it in one day — but did not know whether to advance the army to the utmost before stopping, or to let the troops march on and enter the king’s retinue without stopping the army?”

The text then becomes fragmentary, with two damaged lower strips preserving an address to a “gentleman” (jūn zǐ 君子).

Historical significance. The Battle of Chéngpǔ is extensively documented in the transmitted record — the Zuǒzhuàn 左傳 (Xī 28), Guóyǔ 國語 (Chǔyǔ 楚語), and Shǐjì 史記 — always from a Jìn perspective or a neutral annalistic one. The Shanghai Museum text is distinctive in presenting a Chǔ-internal post-mortem that centers on the contrast between Zǐwén and Zǐyù as models of good and flawed generalship, and in giving the young Wèi Bó Yíng a sophisticated critical voice. The text’s implicit argument — that military virtue lies not in spectacular achievement but in restraint and the timely mentoring of successors — resonates with Chǔ yán 言 (recorded sayings) and shì 事 (historical anecdote) literature more broadly.

Translations and research

  • 馬承源 ed., 《上海博物館藏戰國楚竹書》 vol. 9, Shànghǎi gǔjí chūbǎnshè, 2012 — editio princeps.
  • Shaughnessy, Edward L. Rewriting Early Chinese Texts. SUNY Press, 2006.
  • Pines, Yuri. Envisioning Eternal Empire. University of Hawai’i Press, 2009 — on Spring and Autumn political narratives and their ideological construction.
  • Schaberg, David. A Patterned Past: Form and Thought in Early Chinese Historiography. Harvard University Asia Center, 2001 — on the Zuǒzhuàn tradition and narrative forms for the Chéngpǔ battle.

Graph View