聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

郭店楚墓竹書‧緇衣

5 min read

Text ID
KR2p0150
Date
-400–-300
Dynasty
周

Guōdiàn Chǔmù Zhúshū‧Zīyī 郭店楚墓竹書‧緇衣

Chu Tomb Bamboo Books from Guōdiàn — “Zīyī” (Black Jacket)

(anonymous; attributed to early Confucian school tradition)

About the work

A Confucian text on the qualities of the ideal ruler and his relationship to his ministers and people, recovered from Guōdiàn 郭店 Chu Tomb 1, Jīngmén, Húběi (excavated 1993, sealed ca. 300 BCE). The Zīyī 緇衣 is attested in three forms: the Guōdiàn bamboo-slip version (this entry), the Shanghai Museum bamboo-slip version (KR2p0160 if cataloged), and the received version as Chapter 33 of the Lǐjì 禮記. The Guōdiàn version is the oldest witness and differs in significant ways from the received text.

Abstract

Provenance. Guōdiàn Tomb 1, Jīngmén, Húběi, sealed ca. 300 BCE. For archaeological background see KR2p0148. The Zīyī is one of the non-Lǎozǐ texts from the Guōdiàn find and is attributed by tradition to the school of Zǐsī 子思 (子思), grandson of Confucius, making it significant for the history of early Confucianism and the “Zǐsī–Mèngzǐ” school. The text appears in the editio princeps (荊門市博物館, 《郭店楚墓竹書》, 文物出版社, 1998) with full photographs and transcription.

Content. The digital text preserves the Zīyī in numbered sections (一, 二, 三 …). Each section follows a similar structure: a moral principle stated in the name of “the Master” (fūzǐ yuē 夫子曰 / zǐ yuē 子曰), followed by a supporting quotation from the Shī 詩 (Odes) or Shū 書 (Documents). The text opens: “夫子曰：好美如好緇衣，惡惡如惡巷伯，則民咸力而刑不頓。《詩》云：儀刑文王，萬邦作孚” (“The Master said: Loving the good as one loves the black jacket, hating evil as one hates Alley Uncle [a poem about a slanderer] — then the people will all exert themselves and punishments will not be applied repeatedly. The Odes say: ‘Take King Wén as your model; ten thousand states will trust [you].’”). This programmatic opening encapsulates the text’s ethical project: the ruler’s inner character (hào wù 好惡, likings and dislikings) shapes the conduct of his subjects.

Subsequent sections address: the ruler’s clarity in displaying his loves and hates (section 2); the importance of the ruler behaving consistently so ministers are not confused (section 3); and a systematic treatment of the ruler’s speech, conduct, appointments, and relations with the people. Extensive Shī and Shū citations anchor each maxim in classical authority.

Relationship to received texts. The Zīyī as preserved in the received Lǐjì 禮記 (Chapter 33) is significantly longer and has been reorganized from the Guōdiàn version. The Guōdiàn text lacks several passages present in the received version, and the order of sections differs. The Shanghai Museum bamboo-slip Zīyī (dated to a slightly later period) is closer to the received Lǐjì version than to the Guōdiàn version, suggesting that the text underwent revision between ca. 300 BCE and the final Lǐjì compilation. The Shī and Shū citations in the Guōdiàn version are particularly valuable because they preserve early quotation forms that predate the canonical stabilization of those texts.

Attribution. The received Lǐjì attributes the Zīyī to Gōngsūn Níjǐ 公孫尼子, a disciple of Confucius, but the traditional attribution is uncertain. Most modern scholars associate the text with the broader Zǐsī school. The appearance of the Guōdiàn Zīyī alongside other texts associated with the Zǐsī tradition (Lǔ Mùgōng wèn Zǐsī KR2p0151, Wǔ Xíng 五行, etc.) strengthens this attribution.

Dating. The manuscript was copied ca. 300 BCE. The composition of the Zīyī is generally placed in the fourth century BCE, possibly earlier; the bracket notBefore: −400, notAfter: −300 reflects this estimate.

Translations and research

  • 荊門市博物館, 《郭店楚墓竹書》, 文物出版社, 1998 — editio princeps.
  • Cook, Scott. The Bamboo Texts of Guodian: A Study and Complete Translation. 2 vols. Cornell East Asia Series, 2012 — includes full translation of Zīyī.
  • Shaughnessy, Edward L. Rewriting Early Chinese Texts. SUNY Press, 2006 — includes comparative analysis of the three Zīyī versions.
  • Holloway, Kenneth. Guodian: The Newly Discovered Seeds of Chinese Religious and Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mark. Readings in Han Chinese Thought. Hackett, 2006 — includes the received Lǐjì version for comparison.
  • Nylan, Michael. The Five “Confucian” Classics. Yale University Press, 2001 — contextualizes the Lǐjì within the classical canon.

Other points of interest

The Zīyī is unique among excavated early texts in being attested in three physically independent manuscript witnesses (Guōdiàn, Shanghai Museum, and received Lǐjì), making it one of the best-documented cases of early Chinese textual transmission and allowing unusually detailed study of editorial processes. The convergence of the Shanghai Museum version with the received text, and the divergence of the Guōdiàn version from both, suggests a process of expansion and reorganization between the fourth century BCE and the Hàn canonical compilation.

Graph View

Backlinks