聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

蘇沈良方

6 min read

Text ID
KR3ed009
Date
1075–1101
Dynasty
宋

Sū Shěn Liángfāng 蘇沈良方

Good Recipes of Sū [Shì] and Shěn [Kuò] by 蘇軾 (Sū Shì, 1037–1101, 北宋) and 沈括 (Shěn Kuò, 1031–1095, 北宋), jointly compiled and posthumously combined

About the work

The SūShěn liángfāng is a Northern-Sòng general formulary jointly attributed to two of the most celebrated literati polymaths of the 11th century: the poet-statesman Sū Shì 蘇軾 and the scientist-statesman Shěn Kuò 沈括. The work is the combination of two separate collections: Sū Shì’s Sū Xuéshì fāng 蘇學士方 (collected during his various exiles) and Shěn Kuò’s Liángfāng 良方 (his own medical formulary, in 10 juǎn per his autograph reference in the Mèngxī bǐtán 夢溪筆談). The merger is post-mortem: an unknown editor of the late Northern Sòng or early Southern Sòng combined the two, producing the 15-juǎn (later abridged to 10-juǎn) text that has circulated since. The catalog meta lists 蘇軾 and 沈括 in that order; the Sìkù tíyào prefers the order ShěnSū liáng fāng 沈蘇良方, on the grounds that Shěn Kuò’s material is more substantial. Modern editions vary.

The 10-juan version transmitted in hxwd is the post-Yuán scholar abridgement, retaining the bulk of the medical recipes and theoretical discussion while compressing the literati-anecdote sections that the joint-authored Sū Shěn tradition was famous for. The opening preface — a programmatic essay on the “five difficulties of medicine” (wǔ nán 五難: difficulty of diagnosis, of treatment, of administering medicine, of compounding medicine, of distinguishing drugs) — is Shěn Kuò’s own and is one of the most-quoted methodological essays of Sòng medical literature.

Prefaces

The hxwd recension preserves Shěn Kuò’s autograph preface, which articulates the “five difficulties of medicine”:

  1. Difficulty of diagnosis — physicians today rely on pulse alone; ancient physicians read the patient’s sound, colour, gesture, skin texture, character, dietary habit, occupation, etc., and still worried about misjudgement. To diagnose well is hard.
  2. Difficulty of treatment — old recipes presumed knowledge of cosmological cycles, geographic peculiarities, individual constitutional differences, and the synergistic vs antagonistic interaction of drug, season, food, and emotion. To apply a recipe correctly is harder than reading it off a page.
  3. Difficulty of administering medicine — boiling time, water source, drinker’s discipline, all affect outcome. The recipe is only the start.
  4. Difficulty of compounding — single drugs are easy to know, combinations hard. Wine, vinegar, citrus, crab, persimmon, mercury, sulphur, alum — all show that two substances together produce a third behaviour neither has alone. Predicting these combinations exceeds what the bencao can codify.
  5. Difficulty of authenticating drugs — jú in Jiāngnán becomes zhǐ across the Yangtze; chickens darken across the Lǐng pass; yuè and yuè taste different in two adjacent fields. Drug provenance, harvest timing, storage method all matter, and the bencao cannot capture them.

This is the single best-known Sòng-era essay on the epistemology of clinical medicine and is regularly quoted in modern histories of Chinese medicine.

Abstract

Sū Shì (1037–1101), zì Zǐzhān 子瞻, hào Dōngpō jūshì 東坡居士, the great Northern-Sòng poet and statesman, took an active interest in medicine during his Hángzhōu prefectship (1089–1091, when he established the Ānlèfáng 安樂坊 charitable hospital), his Huìzhōu 惠州 exile (1094–1097), and his Hǎinán 海南 exile (1097–1100). He collected effective recipes from physicians, patients, and folk informants and recorded them in a personal notebook (Sū Xuéshì fāng 蘇學士方). Several of these recipes — particularly his cinnabar-anti-malarial shèngsǎn 聖散 and his cold-relief cōngbáitāng 蔥白湯 — are attested in his collected letters.

Shěn Kuò (1031–1095, CBDB 1294), zì Cúnzhōng 存中, the great Northern-Sòng scientist (author of the Mèngxī bǐtán 夢溪筆談), assembled a formal medical text, the Liángfāng 良方, in 10 juǎn. In the Mèngxī bǐtán (j. 25–26) he discusses many of the recipes that appear in the present compilation, indicating that the joint-authored text incorporates his own work.

The merger of the two sources is a late-Northern-Sòng or early-Southern-Sòng editorial event; it is not by either Sū or Shěn personally. Sòngshǐ Yìwénzhì 宋史藝文志 records the SūShěn liáng fāng in 10 juǎn (under the abridged form) and the Shěn Cúnzhōng liáng fāng 沈存中良方 separately in 15 juǎn (Shěn’s stand-alone work). The catalog meta places the work under 宋 with both names, which is correct in form even though the historical work is a posthumous compilation rather than a jointly authored book. The 1075–1101 date bracket reflects the period during which both authors were actively recording recipes; the merger itself probably postdates Sū’s death.

The work’s significance: (i) it captures the literati-medical interest of 11th-century scholar-officials, who increasingly took medicine into their personal-improvement and charitable-philanthropy purview; (ii) it preserves recipes drawn from outside the imperial-formulary tradition — folk recipes from Sū’s exile peripheries (Hǎinán, Lǐngnán) and Shěn’s empirical experiments; (iii) it transmits Shěn’s Wǔ nán 五難 essay, a methodological touchstone for Chinese medical philosophy down to the present.

Translations and research

  • Goldschmidt, Asaf. 2009. The Evolution of Chinese Medicine: Song Dynasty, 960–1200. Routledge. — discusses the literati-medical movement and Sū’s hospital project.
  • Hartwell, Robert M. 1962. “Financial Expertise, Examinations, and the Formulation of Economic Policy in Northern Sung China.” JAS 30: 281–314 — for Shěn Kuò’s intellectual context.
  • Hé Shíxī 何時希 (coll.). 1956. Sū-Shěn liáng fāng 蘇沈良方 (punctuated edition). Beijing.
  • Sivin, Nathan. 2015. Health Care in Eleventh-Century China. Springer. — treats both authors at length.
  • Wilkinson, Chinese History: A New Manual §41.3.2.

Other points of interest

The “Wǔ nán” essay (五難 “five difficulties”) is one of the most philosophically self-aware statements of Sòng medical epistemology, predating by some decades the Jin-Yuán polemical-physicians (Lǐ Gǎo 李杲, Zhū Zhènhēng 朱震亨) whose theoretical disputes would later dominate Chinese medical historiography. Shěn’s insistence that no general system of medicine could cover the variability of individual cases — only a physician’s trained judgment, exercised case by case — is an early articulation of what later Chinese medicine would call biànzhèng lùnzhì 辨證論治.

Graph View

Backlinks