聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

禽獸決錄

7 min read

Text ID
KR3i0051
Date
483–500
Dynasty
南齊

Qínshòu juélù 禽獸決錄

Definitive Record of Birds and Beasts by 卞彬 (Biàn Bīn, 撰)

About the work

A short Southern-Qí 南齊 satirical work in one juàn, surviving only as fragments (the present Kanripo text being a Qing-era 輯佚 jíyì reconstruction stitched together out of quotations preserved in the standard histories and the great Táng–Sòng encyclopedias). The signature passage — preserved verbatim in NánQí shū 南齊書 卷52 (文學傳·卞彬傳) — uses brief one-line zoological “judgments” (jué 決) on the moral natures of various beasts (sheep, pig, dog, etc.) as transparent satirical allegories for named contemporaries of the Yǒngmíng 永明 court under Qí Wǔdì 齊武帝. The work is a key document for both early-medieval Chinese satire-and-allegory and the social history of late-fifth-century official-eunuch culture.

The text is not in WYG; the KRP recension is taken from the Hànjí diànzǐ wénxiàn zīliàokù 漢籍電子文獻資料庫 / CHANT (CH2d1739, Liùcháo segment 35 Nóngyè) printing of the reconstructed text, traditionally bound with other Liùcháo natural-history fragments. The chant-source label “晉” is a generic Six-Dynasties placeholder and is incorrect: the work is securely Southern Qí, datable from internal evidence (the names of the lampooned officials) to the Yǒngmíng / Jiànwǔ years, c. 483–500.

Abstract

The genuine, securely-attributed fragment of the Qínshòu juélù is the opening passage of the received text and is preserved verbatim in NánQí shū 卷52 in Bian Bin’s biography:

羊性淫而狠 — 豬性卑而率 — 狗性險而出。皆指斥當時貴埶：羊淫狠謂呂文顯，豬卑率謂朱隆之，狗險出謂呂文廉也。

— “The sheep’s nature is lascivious and stubborn; the pig’s nature is base and rash; the dog’s nature is treacherous and forward. All are oblique stabs at the powerful of the day: by the lascivious-stubborn sheep he meant Lǚ Wénxiǎn 呂文顯; by the base-rash pig he meant Zhū Lóngzhī 朱隆之; by the treacherous-forward dog he meant Lǚ Wénlián 呂文廉.”

The NánQí shū version of this passage adds a fourth beast — the goose (é 鵝, é xìng wán ér ào 鵝性頑而傲, “the goose is dull and arrogant,” lampooning Pān Chǎng 潘敞) — that is absent from the KRP recension; the fourth Qing-era satirical target Lǚ Wéndù 呂文度 appears in some transmitted versions of the passage as the dog (in place of the KRP’s Lǚ Wénlián), suggesting the received text fixes one of two variant readings preserved in different witnesses. Lǚ Wénxiǎn, Zhū Lóngzhī, and the *Lǚ Wén-*surnamed eunuchs were among the most notorious of Qí Wǔdì’s inner-court favorites; the NánQí shū expressly notes that the satirical passages “circulated among the common people” and earned Bian Bin the lasting hatred of the inner-court establishment.

The remainder of the KRP recension consists of further short passages attributed to or appended to the lost Qínshòu juélù by later compilers, drawn from quotations preserved chiefly in Tàipíng yùlǎn 太平御覽 and other lèishū. These include: an apotropaic charm involving tigers’-noses hung in doorways to ensure male progeny; the legend of Wéi Shànjùn 韋善俊 and his dog (called “Black Dragon” Wūlóng 烏龍) which transformed into a true dragon (a Táng-period story, certainly not original to Biàn Bīn but absorbed into the corpus by Qing 輯佚 compilers); short notes on the perceptual specializations of various creatures (pheasants hear well, wolves see well, foxes are suspicious, camels can sense underground water, elephants detect hollow ground); the famous yún yè 芸葉 (rue-leaf) book-protection note explaining the southern custom of placing rue under sleeping-mats to deter fleas; the legend of Lǐ Xìnchún 李信純 and his loyal black-dragon dog (another story actually originating in Sōushén jì / Shùyì jì); and several other miscellaneous qínshòu notes. The mixture of genuine BiànBīn fragments with later-attributed material is characteristic of Qing-era jíyì reconstruction practice and gives the received text a heterogeneous quality; the security of the satirical-allegory passage (firmly anchored in NánQí shū) is the principal value of the work.

Beyond the Qínshòu juélù itself, Biàn Bīn was also the author of the well-known satirical fù 賦 Sǎn yú fù 蝬魚賦 (“Encomium on the Dried Fish”) and Hámá fù 蝦蟆賦 (“Encomium on the Toad”), both also preserved in his NánQí shū biography and likewise using zoological allegory for political satire. The three works together form an unusually coherent satirical œuvre and one of the most pointed corpora of late-fifth-century political invective.

The dating is constrained externally by the official careers of the lampooned figures: Lǚ Wénxiǎn was Wǔdì’s notorious zhōngshū tōngshì 中書通事 during the Yǒngmíng era (483–493); Zhū Lóngzhī was an inner-court favorite of similar period; Biàn Bīn himself died as a prefect during the Yǒngyuán 永元 era (499–501) of the last Southern-Qí emperor. The composition is therefore datable to between c. 483 (Yǒngmíng accession) and c. 500 (Bian Bin’s death).

Translations and research

  • Knechtges, David R. and Taiping Chang. 2014. Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature: A Reference Guide. Vol. 3. Leiden: Brill. Treats Biàn Bīn in the Liù-cháo satire entry; the Qín-shòu jué-lù is identified as the principal source for his satirical practice.
  • Tian, Xiaofei. 2010. Beacon Fire and Shooting Star: The Literary Culture of the Liang (502–557). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center. Treats Biàn Bīn briefly in the prehistory of Liáng-era satire.
  • 卜永堅 Bǔ Yǒngjiān. 2018. Liù-cháo dòng-wù yù-yán wén-xué yán-jiū 六朝動物寓言文學研究. Shànghǎi: Shànghǎi gǔjí. Devotes a chapter to Biàn Bīn’s three zoological satires.
  • 陳橋驛 Chén Qiáoyì (annot.). 2003. Hàn-Wèi Liù-cháo bǎi-sān-jiā jí 漢魏六朝百三家集 (中) — collects the reconstructed Biàn Bīn fragments alongside his fù corpus.
  • Quán Liáng wén 全梁文 (Yán Kějūn 嚴可均, 1836) preserves the fù corpus; the standard reference edition of the satirical-fragment corpus.

Other points of interest

The genuine satirical passage is a remarkable document of fifth-century political invective. Its directness — naming powerful court officials by name and pairing each with a moral-zoological judgment — was extraordinarily transgressive and helps explain Biàn Bīn’s pattern of being passed over for advancement (despite his learning and good family) and his eventual prefectural exile. The text-history of the passage also illuminates Liùcháo satirical-rhetoric mechanics: the jué 決 (“judgment, verdict”) of the title is a technical legalistic term, deliberately appropriated for satirical purposes to imply that these are not merely literary jests but quasi-judicial sentences on the moral failings of the named officials.

The accidental absorption of later (Táng-period) animal-legends into the received text — the Wéi Shànjùn dragon-dog story, the Lǐ Xìnchún black-dragon legend — is a textbook example of how Qing-era jíyì reconstruction methods, while invaluable for recovering otherwise-lost texts, also produce composite “works” whose internal authorship is not uniform. Scholars using the received Qínshòu juélù should treat only the NánQí shū passage as securely Biàn Bīn’s.

Graph View

Backlinks