聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

國老談苑

8 min read

Text ID
KR3l0052
Date
1022–1063
Dynasty
北宋

Guólǎo tányuàn 國老談苑

Garden of Talk by the Elder Statesmen by 王君玉 (撰)

About the work

A two-juàn anecdote-collection (bǐjì 筆記) recording sayings, deeds, and court precedents from the reigns of the first three Northern-Sòng emperors — Tàizǔ 太祖 (r. 960–976), Tàizōng 太宗 (r. 976–997), and Zhēnzōng 真宗 (r. 997–1022) — with material trailing into the early Rénzōng 仁宗 reign (e.g., the downfall of Dīng Wèi 丁謂 in 1022 and the demotion of Wáng Qīnruò 王欽若). The old recension is attributed to Yímén yǐnsǒu 夷門隱叟 (“the Recluse of Yímén” — Yímén being a classical alias for the Northern-Sòng capital Kāifēng, after the eastern gate of the Warring-States Wèi capital Dàliáng 大梁) Wáng Jūnyù 王君玉; both Chén Zhènsūn’s 陳振孫 Zhízhāi shūlù jiětí 直齋書錄解題 and the Sòng shǐ Yìwén zhì 宋史藝文志 record the work instead as Guólǎo xián tán 國老閒談, attributed simply to Yímén Jūnyù 夷門君玉 with no surname. The Sìkù compilers therefore conclude that the present title is a later editor’s invention and the “Wáng” surname likewise a later interpolation. (Note: the project catalog meta gives the title as 國光談苑, evidently a typographical slip for 國老談苑; the WYG source text clearly reads 國老. The correct form is followed here.)

Tiyao

Your servants report: Guólǎo tányuàn in 2 juàn, the old recension titled “compiled by Yímén yǐnsǒu Wáng Jūnyù.” On consultation, Chén Zhènsūn’s Shūlù jiětí and the Sòng shǐ Yìwén zhì give the title as Guólǎo xián tán, with the juàn-count matching the present work; the note says “compiled by Yímén Jūnyù”, without giving the surname. That being so, the present title is later editors’ revision, and the “Wáng” character is also a later addition. The work records miscellaneous matters of the three Sòng reigns of Tàizǔ, Tàizōng, and Zhēnzōng; on the shìdàfū (gentleman-officials) of the period it is freely disparaging or laudatory — especially elevating Tián Xī 田錫 and disparaging Táo Gǔ 陶穀, while the rest, such as Féng Zhěng 馮拯, do not escape its barbed remarks. Although it occasionally exaggerates praise or blame, in the main it relies on fact and can be trusted. Items such as Fàn Zhì 范質 refusing bribes, Dòu Yí 竇儀 deliberating the imperial-younger-brother’s countersigning of edicts as Kāifēng yǐn 開封尹, Zhào Pǔ 趙普 requesting to accompany the campaign against Shàngdǎng 上黨, and Cáo Bīn 曹彬 returning from the pacification of Shǔ with nothing in his sack but books — all of these the Sòng shǐ has incorporated into its lièzhuàn biographies. Many other passages are also fully and richly narrated and serve well for comparison with the historical record. Only the entry on Tàizǔ’s battle of Qīngliúguān 清流關 — claiming that he personally beheaded the rebel-general Huángfǔ Huī 皇甫暉 in combat — is mistaken: Huī’s army was defeated and he was captured alive, sent to the imperial encampment at Shòuzhōu 壽州, where the HòuZhōu Shìzōng 周世宗 even bestowed on him a gold-belt and saddle-horse; he died because his wounds were severe and he refused treatment, not slain on the field. The further claim that the temples ringing the city of Chú 滁 all rang their bells at this time, and so a fixed observance arose — in fact the people of Chú’s daily five-watch bell-ringing was the work of later persons commemorating Huī’s spirit and offering merit-transferences for him; it did not arise as aid to Tàizǔ in battle. Such are mistaken reports passed down in hearsay, which cannot be wholly relied on. As to its statement that Tàizōng favoured the seasoned and mature, and that Kòu Zhǔn 寇準, wishing to advance quickly, therefore took dìhuáng 地黃 (Chinese-foxglove) and lúfú 蘆菔 (radish) to make his hair turn white — one fears Kòu Zhǔn could not have descended quite so far. Qiánlóng 46th year (1781), tenth month, reverently collated. Chief compilation officers: Jì Yún 紀昀, Lù Xīxióng 陸錫熊, Sūn Shìyì 孫士毅. Chief collation officer: Lù Fèichí 陸費墀.

Abstract

The author’s surname and lifedates are uncertain. The Sìkù tíyào’s deduction — that the old recension simply signed “Yímén Jūnyù” without a surname and the “Wáng” was added by later editors — is widely followed; modern editions of the Quán Sòng bǐjì 全宋筆記 (Dàxiàng, 2nd series, 2006) accordingly enter the work under the bare Yímén Jūnyù. The CBDB has no confident match: id 22230 (a Wáng Jūnyù praised in Wáng Ānshí’s mùbiǎo 墓表 funerary inscription, fl. mid-eleventh century) is chronologically possible but is otherwise undocumented as an author of bǐjì; the matter is best left open. The Yímén sobriquet places the author in or in the orbit of Kāifēng.

The composition window is constrained internally rather than by external testimony. The latest datable events in the second juàn — the political disgrace of Dīng Wèi (1022 / Qiánxīng 1) and the demotion of Wáng Qīnruò — fall at the very end of Zhēnzōng’s reign and the opening of Rénzōng’s, so the work cannot have been completed before c. 1022. The work was already in circulation by the time Chén Zhènsūn (1186–1262) compiled the Shūlù jiětí, which is a terminus ante quem of c. 1250 but obviously of no use in fixing the date of composition. The Yímén yǐnsǒu persona and the conspicuous absence of any Rén-zōng-reign court-business narrative (in contrast to the work’s confident handling of Zhēnzōng material) together with the laudatory treatment of Tián Xī (d. 1003) and Wèi Yěshì 衛玉氏-era figures, suggest a Rén-zōng-reign composition by an older retired official looking back on the founding-generation court he had served as a junior. The bracket 1022–1063 (Rénzōng’s reign) is followed here as the tightest defensible window; a date in the Tiānshèng 天聖 — Jǐngyòu 景祐 decade (1023–1037) is the most economical guess.

In substance the work belongs to the principal Northern-Sòng bǐjì of gùshí 故事 / zhǎnggù 掌故 (court precedent and institutional anecdote) — alongside Fàn Zhèn’s 范鎮 Dōngzhāi jìshì 東齋記事 (KR3l0034), Wén Yíng’s 文瑩 Yùhú yěshǐ 玉壺野史, Sīmǎ Guāng’s 司馬光 Sùshuǐ jìwén 涑水記聞, Péng Chéng’s 彭乘 Mòkè huīxī 墨客揮犀, and others — and was heavily mined by the Yuán Sòng shǐ compilers for material on the founding ministers (Fàn Zhì, Dòu Yí, Zhào Pǔ, Cáo Bīn). Its persistent moral attitude — strong praise for the rectitude of Tián Xī, condemnation of the literary careerist Táo Gǔ, fault-finding with Féng Zhěng — anticipates the moralizing bent of the Yuányòu 元祐 historiographic tradition (Sīmǎ Guāng, Lǚ Gōngzhù 呂公著), even though the work itself is earlier and pre-Xīníng in date.

Modern critical edition: Quán Sòng bǐjì, 2nd series, vol. 1 (Zhèngzhōu: Dàxiàng, 2006), edited under the general direction of Zhū Yìān 朱易安 and Fù Xuáncóng 傅璇琮, in which the work is collated against the Wényuāngé Sìkù, the Míng Bàihǎi 稗海, the Bǐjì xiǎoshuō dàguān 筆記小說大觀, and the Lángé chāoběn 藍格鈔本 manuscript.

Translations and research

  • Zhū Yì-ān 朱易安 / Fù Xuán-cóng 傅璇琮 et al., eds. Quán Sòng bǐjì 全宋筆記. 2nd series, vol. 1. Zhèngzhōu: Dàxiàng chūbǎnshè, 2006. Standard critical text, with collation notes.
  • Zhōu Xūn-chū 周勛初, ed. Táng yǔlín jiào-zhèng 唐語林校證 and related bǐjì surveys repeatedly cite Guólǎo tányuàn as a model for Northern-Sòng anecdote-collection.
  • No European-language translation has been located.

Other points of interest

Two features make the work notable beyond its quarry-value for the Sòng shǐ biographies. First, its forthright disparagement of Táo Gǔ — the early-Sòng literary functionary remembered chiefly for the fact that the Sòng founding bureaucracy used him without ever quite trusting him — supplies some of the sharpest characterizations of that figure in the Sòng bǐjì tradition. Second, the Sìkù compilers’ own critique of the Qīngliúguān battle entry (Huángfǔ Huī was captured alive and died of untreated wounds, not slain by Tàizǔ in the field) furnishes a textbook case of the Sìkù tíyào method: a bǐjì may be both substantially useful for “supplementing the shǐwén” and yet wrong on a particular dramatic detail, and the duty of the cataloguer is to flag the error rather than dismiss the work.

Graph View

Backlinks