聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

楓窗小牘

9 min read

Text ID
KR3l0056
Date
1127–1202
Dynasty
南宋

Fēngchuāng xiǎodú 楓窗小牘

Small Tablets from the Maple Window by 袁□ (撰)

About the work

A two-juàn anecdote-collection (bǐjì 筆記) by an unnamed author of the surname Yuán 袁 — written, on his own statement, in the first decade of his Jiànyán-era refugee residence in the mountains of Línān 臨安 after the Jìngkāng fall of Biànjīng 汴京 in 1126/27 — supplemented and finally edited down to its received form decades later, by a man approaching the “bǎisuì lǎorén” (centenarian) of the old colophon. The author’s family had served at the Huīzōng court: his great-grandfather Yànfāng 彥方 was a zànshàn dàifū 贊善大夫 known by Sū Shì; his father held a near-palace official rank and composed an Àiyuèhuátái sòng 萼綠華臺頌 for the Gènyuè 艮嶽 imperial garden. Most of the contents are first- or second-hand reports of late Northern-Sòng Biànjīng life — the Gènyuè, the imperial palace, the inner-canal system (jīngchéng héqú), market wards, neighbourhood household-counts, capital-city customs, fashion, court ceremonial, and contemporary literary anecdote — material which complements KR3l0036 Dōngjīng mèngHuá lù, KR3l0050 Zhēnxí fàngtán, and KR3l0051 Tiěwéishān cóngtán. The title alludes to the opening passage: the author sat by the western window of his Línān cottage, gazing on the wūjiù 烏桕 (Chinese tallow) trees whose crimson autumn leaves were reflected on his desk in the dānyè cánxiá 丹葉殘霞 (crimson leaves, fading sunset) — and over wine, recorded what he remembered. The text was transmitted with a colophon “bǎisuì lǎorén” (centenarian); the Sìkù compilers, noting that the upper juàn reports Chóngníng (1102–1106) fashion and the lower juàn the Jiātài 2 (1202) lunar eclipse — c. 97 years apart — judge the colophon credible.

Tiyao

Your servants report: Fēngchuāng xiǎodú in 2 juàn, no author’s name recorded. Prefixed is a preface by Yáo Shìlín of Hǎiyán of the Míng. By the entry Xiān sānlǎo (“the three elders before”) within the book, cross-checked with Hóng Shì’s Lìshì (Stele transcriptions) and the Yuán Liáng bēi (Yuán Liáng stele), we know the author’s surname is Yuán. Further, there are the phrases “as a youth I grew up in Dàliáng” (i.e., Biànjīng) and “later sojourned in Línān”, from which his native place can be known. His given name, however, is in the end unrecoverable. Zhā Shènxíng, in his note on Sū Shì’s poem Láihètíng, cites him as Yuán Jiǒng 袁褧; the basis of this is uncertain.

The upper juàn records the Chóngníng-era hairstyle “dàbìn fāngé” (large temple-locks and broad foreheads); the lower juàn speaks of the Jiātài 2 (1202) lunar eclipse. Counting from the end of Chóngníng, this is a span of 97 years — the old colophon naming the author Bǎisuì lǎorén (Centenarian) is not false. Most recorded are Biànjīng old reports — such as the Gènyuè, the capital, the canals, the palaces, the household-registers — and many can be cross-checked with the Sòng shǐ and biographies. His shìfēi (judgments of right and wrong) are also generally fair. Only on Hóng Chú 洪芻 — who on the day of the gēnkuò jīnyín (forced gold-and-silver levy after the Jin invasion) seized palace women and exacted song to enliven his drinking, whose crime was beyond death and who was banished to a far island, the Sòng law already lenient — this book strenuously argues his innocence: an extreme pīmiù (perversity), insufficient for evidence. Respectfully checked, Qiánlóng 42 (1777), 8th month. Chief Compilers: Jì Yún, Lù Xīxióng, Sūn Shìyì. Chief Collator: Lù Fèichí.

Abstract

The work is one of the dwindling number of late-Northern-Sòng / early-Southern-Sòng bǐjì by Biànjīng native émigrés who, having lived through the Jìngkāng catastrophe, recorded what they remembered of the lost capital in their southern-refuge years. The author’s identity is unrecoverable in detail; the Sìkù compilers (and Yáo Shìlín’s Míng preface preserved with the text) could pin down only:

  1. the surname Yuán 袁, established by his own quotation of the “Xiān sānlǎo” (three elders) entry against the Yuán Liáng bēi 袁良碑 (the stele to a Hàn ancestor of the Yuán clan), preserved in Hóng Shì’s Lìshì 隸釋;
  2. native place Dàliáng 大梁 (= Biànjīng), and post-1127 residence in Línān 臨安;
  3. a Biànjīng official lineage — great-grandfather zànshàn dàifū 贊善大夫 Yànfāng 彥方 (known by Sū Shì’s correspondence as “Yǔ rén shū” / “Letter to a Mr.” in the Wénzhōng jí); a near-palace official father; an uncle who served as cǎn of Zhèngzhōu; a cousin (zǐ) styled Bóshì Yí 博士頤. The clan is one of the “Biànzhōng yīzān qiáojiù” (old gentry-families of Biànjīng).
  4. long life — the colophon “Bǎisuì lǎorén” (Centenarian) is corroborated by internal references spanning 1106 (Chóngníng fashion) to 1202 (Jiātài 2 eclipse), c. 97 years.

The catalog meta records the author as 袁□ (surname only, given name missing); the Sìkù tíyào rejects Zhā Shènxíng 查慎行’s identification with Yuán Jiǒng 袁褧 (a Míng Jiāqùtáng 嘉趣堂 publisher of Sòng bǐjì, no relation) as without basis. The frontmatter [[袁□]] (撰) follows the catalog and the tíyào’s honest position; the cross-references in much pre-modern bibliographical literature to “Yuán Jiǒng” should be understood as Zhā’s unverified guess.

Composition window. The author’s youth was in Biànjīng under Huīzōng; his refugee flight to Línān is dated 1126/27 (the work’s opening passage: “I hastily crossed the river and sojourned in the mountains of Línān; my father’s hand-edited books all became nothing — day by day, facing the wūjiù tree by the western window, I recalled the old reports and recorded some dozens of items”). The earliest stratum of the Fēngchuāng xiǎodú is therefore datable to c. 1127–1130s, written from memory in early Jiànyán exile. The latest internal date is Jiātài 2 (1202), so the work received its final form near the end of Níngzōng’s reign. Hence the bracket 1127–1202.

Contents. The principal value of the work for Sòng historiography is the unique Biànjīng documentary material: detailed reports on the Gènyuè 艮嶽 imperial garden (cross-reference KR3l0036 Dōngjīng mèngHuá lù), on capital-city household-register figures (the work gives household-count series for the founding of Sòng through Huīzōng: 967,553 → 2,508,065 → 3,574,257 → 18,780,000 — figures used by modern Sòng demographers), on the capital canal system, palace layouts, ward markets, and Biànjīng literary anecdote (including the Sū Shì circle, Yáng Yì 楊億, Xú Xuàn 徐鉉 of the Tàipíng guǎngjì editorial board, and the Northern-Sòng painter Lǐ Chéng 李成). The Sìkù tíyào singles out as the work’s principal cí (defect) its strenuous defense of Hóng Chú 洪芻 — the Jìngkāng official who exploited the gēnkuò jīnyín levy to plunder palace women, banished to Hǎinán, whom the Fēngchuāng xiǎodú tries to exonerate against contemporary consensus.

Yáo Shìlín’s 姚士粦 Míng preface (gēngxū chūn, i.e., Wànlì 38 = 1610) notes that Wáng Sǔnān 王損庵 (Wáng Kěntáng 王肯堂, the Jīntán tàishǐ) praised the book as “containing much heard outside the histories”; Wáng Bótāo 王伯弢 and Yú Huìshēng 于惠生 admired its Yīngwǔ wén (Parrot composition) entry; Yáo himself preferred the YānDān (Crown-Prince of Yān) narrative for its xióngshuǎng jiǎnmiào (heroic clarity, terse marvel). Yáo’s preface also flags the entry on Sū Shì’s Xiāngguósì poem decipherment, attributed in the work to Sū’s exile period (Yáo doubts the attribution).

Transmission. The Sòng shǐ Yìwén zhì does not record the work under any Yuán-surname title that maps clearly. The Míng Bàihǎi 稗海 series included it; Yáo Shìlín’s preface above is the principal Míng Bàihǎi paratext. The 2-juàn WYG form is the Míng/Sìkù receivable form; no claim of an earlier Sòng form survives.

Standard modern edition: Kǒng Fánlǐ 孔凡禮 and Zhāng Sònghuī 張頌惠, eds., Fēngchuāng xiǎodú · Mòzhuāng mànlù 楓窗小牘・墨莊漫錄 (Zhōnghuá shūjú 1991, TángSòng shǐliào bǐjì cóngkān), is the standard collated text.

Translations and research

  • Kǒng Fán-lǐ 孔凡禮 et al., eds. Fēng-chuāng xiǎo-dú · Mò-zhuāng màn-lù (Zhōnghuá 1991). Critical edition with introduction and collation notes; reviews the authorship problem.
  • West, Stephen H. “The Interpretation of a Dream: The Sources, Evaluation, and Influence of the Dōngjīng Mèng-Huá lù.” T’oung Pao 71 (1985): 63–108. Repeatedly cites Fēng-chuāng xiǎo-dú on Biàn-jīng household figures, the Gèn-yuè, and the capital canal system as a parallel and check on Dōng-jīng mèng-Huá lù.
  • Heng, Chye Kiang. Cities of Aristocrats and Bureaucrats: The Development of Medieval Chinese Cityscapes (UHP 1999). Uses Fēng-chuāng xiǎo-dú for Biàn-jīng urban demography.
  • Hartman, Charles. The Making of a Confucian Hero (CUP 2021). Cites the work occasionally for Huī-zōng-era court culture.
  • No European-language translation of the full work has been located.

Other points of interest

The work’s defense of Hóng Chú 洪芻 (which the Sìkù compilers explicitly condemn as the book’s worst lapse) reflects the author’s Biànjīng-gentry affiliations: Hóng Chú had been a Northern-Sòng court official whose post-Jìngkāng misconduct fell on the side of the Biànjīng establishment defending itself against Jīn extortion, and the émigré literati for whom the author writes evidently preserved a partisan view of the affair. Modern Sòng historians (e.g., Zhū Ruìxī 朱瑞熙, in his survey of Jìngkāng sources) cite this entry as a textbook example of how bǐjì by Biànjīng émigrés should be cross-checked against Yàolù 要錄 and Chángbiān shíbǔ 長編拾補 — not dismissed, but read with awareness of their class and city allegiances.

The work also preserves an unusual passage on the painter Lǐ Chéng 李成 — that he was a xìng shì xiāngyào míngjiǔ (lover of fragrant medicines and famous wines) who frequented the Sòngyàojiā 宋藥家 east of the Xiāngguó monastery in Biànjīng and would, in his cups, lavish ink and colour not only on silk but on the shop’s walls — one of the most cited Fēngchuāng xiǎodú entries in modern Sòng painting history.

Graph View

Backlinks