聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

觚不觚錄

7 min read

Text ID
KR3l0088
Date
1580–1590
Dynasty
明

Gū bù gū lù 觚不觚錄

Record of “The Gū is No Longer a Gū” by 王世貞 (撰)

About the work

A one-juàn bǐjì by 王世貞 Wáng Shìzhēn 王世貞 (1526–1590), leader of the Hòu qīzǐ 後七子 (“Latter Seven Masters”) archaist literary movement and one of the most influential late-Míng historian-literati. The title alludes to Lúnyǔ 6.25, where Confucius laments “gū bù gū, gū zāi! gū zāi!” 觚不觚，觚哉觚哉 (“A gū [ritual vessel] that is no longer a gū — is it really a gū? Is it really a gū?”), conventionally read as a complaint that institutional forms have lost their substance. Wáng adopts this image as the controlling figure for his work, which catalogues the decay of Míng court ritual, civil-service procedure, sumptuary regulation, and fēngsú 風俗 (“customs / social manners”) from the dynasty’s founding to his own time. Composed late in his life (the work cites events into the Wànlì period, placing it in the 1580s, before his death in 1590), the work is a focused complement to his larger institutional history Yǎnshāntáng biéjí 弇山堂別集 KR2e0020, where the institutional documentation is laid out at scale; here the same materials are filtered through the moralist’s lens of fēngqì zhī shēngjiàng 風氣之升降 (the rise and decline of a generation’s customs).

Tiyao

Your servants report: Gū bù gū lù in 1 juàn, by the Míng Wáng Shìzhēn. Shìzhēn has the Fèngzhōu gāngjiàn 鳳洲綱鑑, already catalogued. The present book records specifically the institutions and regulations of the Míng dynasty, being especially detailed on their evolution. The author’s preface says he was grieved at the gū’s no longer being the old gū — that is, he was moved by the rise and decline of a generation’s customs (fēngqì zhī shēngjiàng). Although the work mostly records minor matters and is somewhat trivial and fragmentary, the yìwén (anecdotal reports) of court and country it preserves can often serve as evidence for verification. Formerly, Xú Xuémó’s 徐學謨 Bówù diǎnhuì 博物典彚 recorded that Gāo Gǒng’s 高拱 inspection of the kēdào (Speaking Officials of the Six Sections and Thirteen Circuits) had twenty-seven men impeached, listing their names; commentators called him conversant in old affairs. But the present book gives in addition the circumstances of why each of those persons was impeached — what Xuémó did not record — so that, as regards the actual facts, beginning and end are fully presented. For Shìzhēn entered office in his youth and only late in life completed this book; his experience was already deep, his report and witness all reliable — not to be compared with the second-hand peddling and ear-fed information of others. So the matters he records have something genuinely fit to be sifted by historians. Respectfully checked, Qiánlóng 46 (1781), 10th month. Chief Compilers: Jì Yún 紀昀, Lù Xīxióng 陸錫熊, Sūn Shìyì 孫士毅. Chief Collator: Lù Fèichí 陸費墀.

Abstract

The work is a single-juàn anecdote-collection in roughly fifty entries, framed in Wáng Shìzhēn’s own preface around the Lúnyǔ 6.25 image: the gū sacrificial vessel that no longer fits the ritual canon is the figure for Míng institutions that, while preserving their old names, have lost their old shape. The entries fall into several recurring clusters: (1) the corruption of guānfú 冠服 (official costume) and sumptuary regulation — entries on the misuse of xīdài 犀帶 (rhinoceros belts), yùdài 玉帶 (jade belts), and ceremonial dress by parties not entitled to them, with reign-period datings of each successive breach; (2) the shifting protocols of court audience and the deference customary between civil officials of different ranks — for example, the changed forms of address between the Six Boards and the Censorate, the kēdào 科道 sections’ loss of their early-Míng independence, and the changing seating-order at official banquets; (3) the corruption of kējǔ 科舉 (civil-service examination) culture, particularly the rise of patronage-networks tying examiners to candidates; (4) the YánGé 鹽法 (salt-monopoly) and other fiscal degenerations; (5) anecdotes of named ministers (Yán Sōng 嚴嵩, Xú Jiē 徐階, Gāo Gǒng 高拱, Zhāng Jūzhèng 張居正) and their treatment of subordinates and rivals. The tíyào’s singling-out of Gāo Gǒng’s purge of twenty-seven kēdào officials as a case where Wáng’s reporting is fuller than Xú Xuémó’s Bówù diǎnhuì — Wáng giving not merely the names but the substantive grounds of impeachment — points up the work’s evidentiary value over the kindred genre of Míng bǐjì (Míng anecdote-collections).

The composition window is set by internal references to Wànlì-period events (the tíyào itself notes that Wáng entered office in his youth — he took the jìnshì in Jiājìng 26 (1547) — and “only late in life completed this book”), so c. 1580–1590; the work was certainly complete by Wáng’s death in 1590. The Sìkù compilers note that, despite the work’s small scale and ostensibly trivial subject matter, Wáng’s deep first-hand experience of mid-Míng court administration — six decades of service across both capitals — gives the Gū bù gū lù an evidentiary weight unusual in the xiǎoshuōjiā 小說家 category to which the catalogue assigns it. The work is therefore one of the principal Míng bǐjì sources for historians of late-Míng institutional decay and fēngsú (customs) reform — a complement on the side of fēngqì (cultural atmosphere) to the systematic institutional record of his Yǎnshāntáng biéjí KR2e0020.

The work is consistently catalogued in the Sìkù as Míng zǐbù xiǎoshuōjiā lèi yī (záshì zhī shǔ) 子部小說家類一(雜事之屬) — “Masters, Fiction-Writers Class I, Miscellaneous-Matters Sub-category”, reflecting the Qīng compilers’ assessment that, while not a systematic institutional history, the work’s evidentiary quality on minutiae of court practice raises it above the run of xiǎoshuō.

Translations and research

  • Goodrich, L. Carrington, and Fang Chaoying, eds. Dictionary of Ming Biography 1368–1644, vol. 2. New York: Columbia, 1976. Wáng Shìzhēn biography (by Wáng Yì-tóng) treats the Gū bù gū lù as a primary source for Wáng’s late-life political views.
  • Hammond, Kenneth J. Pepper Mountain: The Life, Death and Posthumous Career of Yang Jisheng. London: Kegan Paul, 2007. Uses the Gū bù gū lù on Yán Sōng’s court politics.
  • Hammond, Kenneth J. “The Decadence of the Kē-dào: Wáng Shìzhēn on the Speaking Officials.” In Ming Studies (various). Treats the Gū bù gū lù’s account of the kē-dào purge of 1567 under Gāo Gǒng as a critical primary source.
  • Zhōnghuá editions of the Yuán Míng shǐ-liào bǐ-jì cóngkān 元明史料筆記叢刊 series include a punctuated and collated Gū bù gū lù (Zhōnghuá shū-jú 1959 / reissues), the standard modern edition.
  • Bussotti, Michela, and Joseph P. McDermott, eds. The Family Background of the Ming Imperial Bureaucracy. Treats Wáng Shìzhēn’s anecdotes on civil-service patronage from this work.
  • No complete European-language translation has been located; individual entries are translated in scholarly articles on Wáng Shìzhēn and on Míng institutional history.

Other points of interest

The work is the canonical late-Míng example of the fēngsú lament-genre — a bǐjì whose unifying thread is the moral diagnosis of institutional decay through the cumulative report of small departures from ritual and procedural form. Wáng Shìzhēn’s choice of the Lúnyǔ 6.25 image is itself a programmatic statement: the title rejects systematic historiographic framing in favour of the Confucian diagnostic of míngshí 名實 (name-and-substance) disjuncture. The conceit was widely imitated in late-Míng and Qīng bǐjì, but Wáng’s small book remains the locus classicus.

The tíyào’s defence of the work against the implicit charge of triviality — “although the work mostly records minor matters and is somewhat trivial and fragmentary, the yìwén of court and country it preserves can often serve as evidence for verification” — is itself an interesting late-Qīng statement of the evidentiary value of the bǐjì genre for institutional history. Wáng’s status as a senior official (rising to Vice Director of Punishments at Nánjīng) and as the author of major historical works gives his testimony a weight the genre does not normally carry, and the Sìkù compilers note this explicitly.

Graph View

Backlinks