聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

裴子語林

6 min read

Text ID
KR3l0135
Date
357–365
Dynasty
東晉

Péizǐ yǔlín 裴子語林

Master Péi’s Forest of Sayings by 裴啟 (撰)

About the work

The Eastern-Jìn anecdotal anthology by Péi Qǐ 裴啟 (裴啟, fl. mid-4th c.) — variously titled Péizǐ yǔlín 裴子語林, Yǔlín 語林, or Yǔ yǔlín 裴語林 in the manuscript tradition. The work is the immediate predecessor of Liú Yìqìng’s 劉義慶 Shìshuō xīnyǔ 世說新語 and is universally treated by modern scholarship as the foundational text of the yǔlín / zhìrén 志人 genre: short anecdotes of memorable utterance and characterological observation drawn from the WèiJìn aristocratic-conversational tradition (qīngtán 清談), arranged topically. Liú Yìqìng’s Shìshuō directly cannibalised material from the Yǔlín (in many cases verbatim), and Liú Jùn 劉峻’s commentary on the Shìshuō (early 6th c.) repeatedly cites the Yǔlín as source-or-parallel — providing both the indirect evidence for the Yǔlín’s contents and the principal route by which its fragments survive.

Tiyao

Lost; no original 提要; fragments only.

Abstract

The Yǔlín is registered in the Suí shū jīngjí zhì 隋書經籍志 (under zǐbù xiǎoshuō) at 10 juàn, attributed to “Jìn Chǔshì Péi Qǐ” 晉處士裴啟. Péi Qǐ’s biography is preserved chiefly through his work’s own reception. The Shìshuō xīnyǔ Qīngyú 輕詆 chapter and Liú Jùn’s commentary on it report the famous anecdote of the work’s compilation and fall: Péi Qǐ composed his Yǔlín in the Lónghé 隆和 reign (362–363) under Āidì 哀帝 of Eastern Jìn; the work was at first eagerly received by the Jiànkāng literati and became “the talk of the town” (qúnzǐ jiē sòng 群子皆誦); but when Xiè Ān 謝安 (320–385), then Sītú 司徒, found in it an apocryphal saying ascribed to him that he could not recall having spoken, he publicly disowned the work, and “from that day the Yǔlín fell from favour, never to be recovered” (Yǔlín suì fèi 語林遂廢). This famous public discredit, datable to the Lónghé or Xīngníng 興寧 reigns (362–365), gives both an inferred composition window (c. 357–365) and the surprising fact that the work was effectively suppressed within a year or two of its compilation, yet continued to circulate in marginal copies for several more centuries.

The work was lost as a transmitted unitary text by the early Sòng — the Chóngwén zǒngmù and the Sòng shǐ yìwén zhì both omit it. Surviving fragments are preserved through three principal channels: (1) Liú Jùn’s 劉峻 (462–521) commentary on the Shìshuō xīnyǔ, which cites the Yǔlín approximately 70 times as source-or-parallel for the main text’s anecdotes (the single most important surviving witness); (2) the Tàipíng yùlǎn 太平御覽 (and to a lesser extent the Tàipíng guǎngjì); (3) the Yìwén lèijù 藝文類聚 and Chūxué jì 初學記. Modern reconstructions: Lǔ Xùn 魯迅 (Gǔ xiǎoshuō gōuchén, c. 1909–11) assembled approximately 180 entries; Zhōu Léngqié 周楞伽 (Péi Qǐ yǔlín 裴啟語林, Wénhuà 1988) is the standard modern critical edition. Lǐ Jiànguó 李劍國 has further refined the textual reconstitution.

The work’s significance is structural rather than thematic. It established the yǔlín / zhìrén genre as such: a topically organised collection of short anecdotes, each centred on a memorable saying or characterological gesture, ascribed by name to a historical figure of the Wèi or (more often) the Jìn aristocracy. Approximately seventy of the surviving entries appear in modified or expanded form in the Shìshuō xīnyǔ — direct evidence that Liú Yìqìng’s compilation was substantially indebted to Péi Qǐ. Several themes of the Shìshuō’s topical divisions (yányǔ 言語 speech; zhèngshì 政事 political affairs; wénxué 文學 learning) are already discernible in the Yǔlín fragments; Mather (Shih-shuo Hsin-yü, 1976; rev. 2002) argues that the Yǔlín established the topic-set that the Shìshuō fixed.

Translations and research

  • Mather, Richard B., trans. Shih-shuo Hsin-yü: A New Account of Tales of the World (Minnesota, 1976; rev. Hawai’i, 2002). The standard scholarly treatment of the Shìshuō tradition; extensive discussion of the Yǔlín’s role as predecessor.
  • Lǔ Xùn 魯迅. Gǔ xiǎo-shuō gōu-chén 古小說鉤沉 (c. 1909–11; published 1938). The pioneering modern reconstruction (c. 180 entries).
  • Zhōu Léng-qié 周楞伽, coll. Péi Qǐ yǔlín 裴啟語林. Wén-huà yì-shù chū-bǎn-shè, 1988. The standard modern critical edition.
  • Wáng Néng-xiàn 王能憲. Shìshuō xīn-yǔ yán-jiū 世說新語研究 (Jiāng-sū gǔ-jí, 1992). Comprehensive treatment of the Yǔlín — Shìshuō relationship.
  • Qián Nán-xiù 錢南秀. Spirit and Self in Medieval China: The Shih-shuo Hsin-yü and its Legacy. University of Hawai’i Press, 2001. Includes discussion of the Yǔlín as predecessor.
  • Lǐ Jiàn-guó 李劍國. Táng qián zhì-guài xiǎo-shuō shǐ 唐前志怪小說史 (Nán-kāi, 1984; rev. 2005), §4 on zhì-rén and the Eastern-Jìn anecdotal tradition.
  • Knechtges, David R., and Chang, Taiping, eds. Ancient and Early Medieval Chinese Literature: A Reference Guide, vol. 2 (Brill, 2014), entry on Péi Qǐ.
  • Wilkinson, Chinese History: A New Manual §62 (zhì-rén / zhì-guài genres).

Other points of interest

The Xiè Ān public disavowal — preserved in the Shìshuō Qīngdǐ 輕詆 chapter and Liú Jùn’s commentary — is one of the rare documented cases in early-medieval China of a literary work being deliberately suppressed by its target. The episode is also a key witness to the social mechanics of qīngtán in the mid-4th c. Jiànkāng aristocracy: a single influential figure (Xiè Ān) could destroy a book’s standing overnight. That so much of the Yǔlín nonetheless survives — through the Shìshuō’s use of it and Liú Jùn’s careful commentary — is a tribute to its actual literary quality. Several anecdotes (Yī Jí 伊籍 on the beauties of Wú; Wēn Qiáo 溫嶠 reporting to the Jìn royal pretenders in Jiànkāng; Wáng Mèng 王濛 and Liú Zhēncháng 劉真長 on advances in cultivation) appear in both Yǔlín and Shìshuō texts, allowing detailed comparison of how Liú Yìqìng edited his source.

Graph View

Backlinks