聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

泰嶽府君記

5 min read

Text ID
KR3l0145
Date
220–400
Dynasty
魏-晉

Tàiyuè fǔjūn jì 泰嶽府君記

Record of the Magistrate of the Great Peak (Mount Tài) by 闕名

About the work

A single-tale zhìguài 志怪 narrative, transmitted as an independently-titled “text” in modern Kanripo cataloguing but originally an excerpted version of the famous Húmǔ Bān 胡母班 — Tàishān fǔjūn 泰山府君 — Hébó 河伯 letter-carrying tale. Húmǔ Bān (zì Jìyǒu 季友, of Tàishān 泰山, a real Eastern-Hàn / Wèi figure attested in Hòu Hàn shū and Sānguó zhì) is intercepted at the foot of Mount Tài by red-clad zōu 騶 outriders of the Magistrate of Mount Tài, presented at the Magistrate’s underworld court, entrusted with a letter to deliver to the Magistrate’s son-in-law the river-god Hébó, and rewarded by Hébó with a pair of dark-silk shoes. Returning a year later, he stops again at Tàishān to report the delivery, and there witnesses his own dead father at corvée labour in the underworld. He intercedes; the Magistrate appoints the father as a local shègōng 社公 (earth-god). Within a year Húmǔ Bān’s sons all die; he returns in terror and is told by the smiling Magistrate, “I warned you that the living and the dead must not be near each other.” The father, summoned, admits that, lonely and homesick, he has been “calling them up” out of love. He is removed from office; Húmǔ Bān goes home, has more sons, and all live.

Tiyao

Lost; no original 提要; fragments only.

Abstract

The narrative is one of the locus classicus texts for the early-medieval Chinese underworld bureaucracy, and the principal early literary source for the cult of Tàishān fǔjūn 泰山府君 (the Magistrate of Mount Tài) as supreme judge of the dead. It is transmitted in (a) Gān Bǎo’s 干寶 Sōushén jì (KR3l0099) juàn 4 under the title 胡母班; (b) the Lièyì zhuàn 列異傳 ascribed to Cáo Pī / Zhāng Huá, where the earliest documented occurrence of the phrase Tàishān fǔjūn is found: “Húmǔ Bān wèi Tàishān fǔjūn zéshū yì Hébó, yí qí qīngsī lǚ, shèn jīngqiǎo yě” 胡母班為泰山府君責書詣河伯，貽其青絲履，甚精巧也; (c) Lùyì zhuàn 錄異傳 with minor textual variants (so Lǔ Xùn’s collation in Gǔ xiǎoshuō gōuchén, pp. 409–410); and (d) Liú Jìngshū 劉敬叔 Yìyuàn 異苑 j. 8. The narrative is in turn cited and recast in Tàipíng guǎngjì 太平廣記.

The present “Tàiyuè fǔjūn jì” is therefore an editor’s title for an extracted tale, not the surviving fragment of a discrete pre-Táng collection of that name: no entry “Tàiyuè fǔjūn jì” appears in the Suí or LiǎngTáng jīngjí / yìwén monographs. The author is anonymous and is therefore recorded as 闕名; Húmǔ Bān is the story’s protagonist, not its author.

The dating bracket adopted here (220–400) reflects the assumed compilation horizon: lower bound mid-3rd c. (the Lièyì zhuàn form, if Wèi); upper bound late-4th c. (the Sōushén jì, c. 320; and the Yìyuàn citation, slightly later). The narrative’s significance lies precisely in its securing of the Tàishānzhǔsǐ 泰山主死 (Mount Tài as the controller of death) tradition in a fully articulated narrative form: an underworld court with red-clad messengers, an attached subordinate fluvial deity, formalised letter-protocols between the yīn offices, a doctrine of shēngsǐ yìlù 生死異路 (“the paths of the living and the dead must not converge”), and a shègōng 社公 appointment system through which the underworld bureaucracy interfaces with the village earth-altar. This complex was later absorbed into Tang-period Buddhist eschatology: by the Táng the Tàishān fǔjūn is reduced to a subordinate of Yánluó wáng 閻羅王 (Yama), as documented in the Míngbào lù 冥報錄 (cf. Tàipíng guǎngjì j. 292); but in this WèiJìn narrative the fǔjūn is still the supreme underworld judge in his own right. The tale also reached Japan via 8th-c. Tendai pilgrimage transmission and became foundational for the Tai-zan Fukun 泰山府君 ritual of Onmyōdō.

Translations and research

  • DeWoskin, Kenneth J. and J. I. Crump, Jr., trans. In Search of the Supernatural: The Written Record (Stanford 1996) — the Sōushén jì recension is translated here.
  • Campany, Robert Ford. Strange Writing (SUNY 1996), pp. 377ff.; idem, Making Transcendents (Hawai’i 2009), with substantial discussion of the Mount Tài underworld bureaucracy.
  • Liú Yuàn-rú 劉苑如. “Xíng-jiàn yǔ míng-bào: liù-cháo zhì-guài zhōng guǐ-guài xù-shù de fěng-yù — yī ge dǎo-yì wéi cháng móshì de kǎo-chá” 形見與冥報 (Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica 29: 1–45) — substantial treatment of the Húmǔ Bān tale.
  • Sakade Yoshinobu 坂出祥伸, ed. Dōkyō to Onmyōdō 道教と陰陽道 — on the Japanese reception.
  • Wáng Guóliáng 王國良. Sōushén jì yán-jiū 搜神記研究 (1984); Liù-cháo zhì-guài xiǎoshuō kǎo-lùn (1988).
  • Lǐ Jiànguó 李劍國. Táng-qián zhì-guài xiǎoshuō shǐ (rev. 2005), §6.

Other points of interest

The Tàishān fǔjūn tradition documented narratively in this fragment is one of the most consequential single elements of medieval Chinese (and East Asian) afterlife religion. The motif of qīngsī lǚ 青絲履 (dark-silk shoes) as Hébó’s gift is also the type-source for several later “shoes from the dead” motifs in TángSòng bǐjì.

Graph View