聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

禪戒訣

4 min read

Text ID
KR6t0305
Date
1690–1715
Dynasty
日本

Chánjiè jué 禪戒訣

Essentials of the Zen Precepts by 道白 Manzan Dōhaku (撰)

About the work

A single-fascicle doctrinal-and-practical treatise on the Sōtō-school precepts (禪戒 zenkai) by 道白 Manzan Dōhaku (1636–1715), the architect of the Manzan reform that restored menju-sōho (face-to-face transmission) to the Edo-period Sōtō school. The work treats the bodhisattva-precepts as transmitted in Sōtō practice as a distinct zenkai tradition, separate from the parallel kyōke (sūtra-school) precept-traditions and centred on the immediate ordination-encounter between master and disciple at the Sōtō zenkai-dan 禪戒壇.

Abstract

The work opens with a programmatic identification:

“The ancient virtuous ones said: The Bodhisattva-precepts are the one great matter of the Zen-gate. From Vulture-Peak [Buddha] and Shaolin [Bodhidharma] they have been direct-direct mutually transmitted; and the various sects all hold them. Only that the Zen-gate takes them as the one great matter — although it is the same precept, when transmitted as Zen-precept, it goes directly into Vairocana’s nature-sea, singly upholds the Vairocana mind-seal. The kaidan form-and-rule, the conferring-and-receiving manners — they emerge high above what the various sects employ; they are not what thinking-discrimination can attain. This is why we call them the one great matter. Suitable! Self-not-being-an-entered-room true-son cannot understand them.”

Manzan then describes the historical situation — the precise problem his reform addresses:

“However, since the Yuán-dynasty, the Cathayan Zen-grove seems to have lost its form-and-rule. Also in this country [Japan], it is gradually decaying. Only at the Eihei gate-below has there been blood-vein receiving — but the altar-rules are not put into practice. The blood-vein is mutually transmitted, unbroken-unbroken not cut off — there is the saying ‘announcing the new-moon with sacrificial sheep’ but the propriety is incomplete. I rejoice at the obtaining; I lament at the disuse. There has been my late master Reverend Tsukio [月老 = Gesshū Sōko 月舟宗胡, see KR6t0302], who riding the vow-power came forth to encourage the return to the ancient Way. Again he obtained the form-and-rule remaining-dharma and again raised the karma-rite (羯磨). Following the karma-rite fallen-thread, he opened-and-amplified the obscure-subtle. I have received that lineage and to the present broadcast it for promulgation. — That is the great-fortune of our gate.”

The text proper is divided into multiple sections (其一, 其二, etc.) covering:

  • The Buddha-Patriarch transmission of the precepts, with reference to the Yèxiàn Guīxǐng 葉縣歸省 blood-vein doctrine.
  • The blood-vein (血脈) and the karma-rite (羯磨) — the two dimensions of the Sōtō ordination, treated as inseparable.
  • The status of the zenkai in relation to the Mahāyāna sūtra precepts — particularly the Brahma-Net Sūtra precepts.
  • Practical instructions on the Sōtō kaidan ordination procedure, covering the precepts-recitation, the kechiwa (血脈) certificate-conferral, the kessei (結戒) closing rite.
  • Discussion of master-disciple relationships in the precepts — particularly the principle that only a fa-si (dharma-heir) may ordain, which is the textual basis of Manzan’s menju-sōho reform.

The dating bracket runs from Manzan’s mature reform-period (c. 1690) through to his death (1715). The Taishō recension is the Edo-period printing.

The work is one of the principal Manzan-school reform manifestos: by recasting the zenkai ordination as a strictly face-to-face transmission, Manzan’s text provided the doctrinal basis for the Genroku 6 / 1693 shogunal edict that codified the Manzan reform across the Edo Sōtō establishment.

Translations and research

No book-length English translation located. For the Manzan reform and the zenkai tradition, see William Bodiford, Sōtō Zen in Medieval Japan (Univ. of Hawai’i Press, 1993), final chapter, and Bodiford, “Dharma Transmission in Soto Zen: Manzan Dohaku’s Reform Movement,” Monumenta Nipponica 46.4 (1991), 423–451 — the principal English-language treatment.

Other points of interest

The phrase “only at the Eihei gate-below has there been blood-vein receiving — but the altar-rules are not put into practice” (惟永平門下只有血脈受得壇法不行) is one of the canonical Manzan-reform sentences and is cited as the principal doctrinal basis for the menju-sōho requirement. The reform’s core claim — that the Sōtō blood-vein certificate had become merely textual, divorced from the actual face-to-face ordination ritual — is documented in this passage as Manzan’s own diagnosis of the problem his master Gesshū had begun to address and which his own reform would complete.

Graph View

Backlinks