聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

荒田隨筆

4 min read

Text ID
KR6t0309
Date
1730–1744
Dynasty
日本

Huāngtián suíbǐ 荒田隨筆

Random Notes from a Wild Field by 慧印 Shigetsu Ein (撰)

About the work

A four-fascicle Sōtō-Zen miscellany by 慧印 Shigetsu Ein (1689–1764), Edo-period Sōtō scholar-monk in the Manzan-school scholastic line. Often called the Indicating-Moon Old Man 指月老人 (the Shigetsu rōjin / zhi-yuè lǎorén allusion to the kōan-saying that the finger pointing at the moon is not the moon), Ein composed the Huāngtián suíbǐ during his late mature period; the text was preserved in manuscript at his temple before being put to print by his disciple Honkō Gushū 本光具壽 with a preface by Tanshi Keimoku-shin 短枝契默眞 dated Enkyō 1 / autumn (延享甲子秋 = autumn 1744 NS) “written at the temporary residence at Buryō (Edo) by the master at Hōrin in Jōnan”.

Abstract

Tanshi’s preface explains the title and the work’s character:

“Antiquity says: ‘Take up a single straw of grass to make Vairocana’s six-foot golden body.’ — Now, the straw of grass is not necessarily a thing in the wild field; the Adjusted-Driver Golden Body — who dares take it as a standout from beyond the dust-shadow? The Indicating-Moon Old-Man’s composition Huāngtián zuihitsu — Random Notes from a Wild Field — was secretly stored in the late-descendants’ walking-bag for years now. The Honkō possessor-elder [本光具壽] cut his cherished property from the guest-bag — engraved-and-printed it for dharma-charity. — One may say: taking-up-and-coming, the golden body comes-forth-now. — Now, the taking-up and the placing-down — empty-palms freely — and the grass-and-golden-body are the eye-cataract’s discrimination.”

The four-fascicle table of contents (each fascicle further divided into upper and lower halves):

  • Fasc. 1 上: Senbutsu 撰佛 (“Selecting the Buddha”) — opening doctrinal framing on the Way of the Mahāyāna as fundamental and the means/results relation; covers the two-truths doctrine, the Eight Doctrines of Tiāntái-school classification, and the Cáodòng-school Five Ranks exposition. Begins: “The Way of the Great-Hero — solid Way! It is as if there is beginning and end, but its starting-point is not seen. There is constantly a face, but its place is not troubled. Right-and-wrong things are unable to covenant matters. Singularly cut-off solitarily standing, universally classed yet contrary-direction.”*
  • Fasc. 1 下: continued senbutsu discussion + Teisō 定祖 (“Establishing the Patriarchs”) — the patriarchal lineage of Buddhism.
  • Fasc. 2 上 / 下: continued exposition.
  • Fasc. 3 上 / 下: world-and-out-of-world practices (修證), liturgy and ordination procedure.
  • Fasc. 4: comparative judgment (hadan kokon 判斷古今) of ancient and modern Buddhist traditions, returning at the close to the single-Buddha-single-transformation essential point (歸一佛一化之的要).

The dating bracket: composition during Ein’s mature scholarly period (c. 1730 onwards) through to the editio princeps (1744), which appeared during Ein’s lifetime and presumably with his approval (he died 1764).

The work is one of the principal late-Edo Sōtō scholar’s encyclopaedic miscellanies and is structurally comparable to Mujaku Dōchū’s KR6t0285 Shōsōrin shingi on the Rinzai side: a wide-ranging philological-doctrinal compendium rather than a focused treatise. Ein’s particular concern with the correlations between TiāntáiHuáyán doctrinal classification and Cáodòng-Zen practice makes it a key source for the cross-school doctrinal awareness of the mid-Edo Sōtō scholastic establishment.

Translations and research

No substantial Western-language scholarship located. For Shigetsu Ein and the late-Edo Sōtō scholastic milieu, see Komazawa Daigaku 駒澤大學 (ed.), Sōtō-shū gakuhō, scattered articles on Edo scholar-monks; Hisamatsu Hōseki 久松保誠, Edo Sōtō-shū gakushi 江戸曹洞宗学史 (Hōzōkan, 1974).

Other points of interest

Shigetsu Ein’s other major work is the Tōjō shitsu-naimon ron 洞上室内聞論 — a commentary on the Sōtō cell-rules — which together with the Huāngtián zuihitsu forms the principal scholastic legacy of his career. Both works are characterised by an unusual doctrinal eclecticism (Cáodòng + Tiāntái + Huáyán + Yogācāra references in close conjunction) that distinguishes Ein from the more strictly Cáodòng-internal scholastic style of his Manzan-line peers.

Graph View