Southern Sòng 宋 Shàngshū and Shī commentator, native of Ānfú 安福 county in Jí’ān fǔ 吉安府 (modern Jiāngxī 江西), with secondary residence in Chángxī 長溪 in Fújiàn (per CBDB id 14390). Zì Xiǎnzhī 顯之, with one source giving the alternate Zhèngfǔ 正甫; styled (hào) Cúnzhāi 存齋 — the title of his now-lost Yǔlù 語錄. Jìnshì of the Qìngyuán era (1195–1200), so active in the early Níngzōng 寧宗 reign and into the Lǐzōng 理宗 reign. Career: served as magistrate of Xīnxīng 新興 county (Guǎngdōng) and of Déqīng 德清 county, where the Lóngxī xiànzhì 龍溪縣志 (a Míng-period local gazetteer cited by the Qiánlóng emperor’s yùtí 御題 to KR1b0019) records that he “took moral transformation as the root of administration” and made jiàohuà 教化 (moral suasion) the priority of his magistracy; ended his recorded career as Fèngyì láng 奉議郎, Quánzhōu pòkàn 泉州泊幹 (Maritime Trade Office vice-supervisor at Quánzhōu in Fújiàn).
Lifedates are unrecorded. Floruit defensibly c. 1190–1240 — bracketed by his Qìngyuán jìnshì and the latest active period plausible for someone whose work directly engages Cài Shěn’s Shū jízhuàn (KR1b0017, completed 1209). The Qiánlóng emperor’s yùtí shī 御題詩 to KR1b0019 misidentifies him as a Chúnxī 淳熙 jìnshì (a slip the Tiyao body silently corrects). Wrote three works of which only one survives: the Shàngshū xiángjiě 尚書詳解 (KR1b0019, 50 juǎn, in Sìkù); the Shī jiǎngyì 詩講義 (lost — Wāng Sēn’s 汪森 1675 Pǔchuān 濮川 colophon to the Xiángjiě notes that this Shī commentary was already not in his collection); and a Cúnzhāi yǔlù 存齋語錄 (lost). His Shàngshū exegesis carries detectable Lù-school 陸九淵 (Jīnxī 金谿) sympathies — the autograph preface’s formula “reading this book one must use the mind of the ancients to seek the book of the ancients; once one’s own mind and the book are in seamless unity, then one knows that the DiǎnMóXùnGàoShìMìng are entirely in one’s breast and may all be enacted in daily practice” is in essence the Liù jīng zhù wǒ 六經注我 doctrine in Shàngshū form — but the body of the work is more eclectic, drawing heavily on HànTáng gǔshū 古疏 (“old subcommentaries”) in dialogue with the contemporaneous Cài zhuàn.