Late-Táng to early Wǔdài (Five Dynasties) author of two surviving leishu-style works: the Suìhuá jìlì 歲華紀麗 (KR3k0067), a four-juan parallel-prose almanac of seasonal allusions, and the Sìshí zuǎnyào 四時纂要, a five-juan agricultural yuèlìng manual that is the only farming text to survive from the seventh through tenth centuries (lost in China but recovered in 1960 from a Korean Wànlì 18 / 1590 reprint preserved at Yamamoto Bookstore in Japan; modern critical edition Miáo Qǐyù 繆啟愉, Sìshí zuǎnyào jiàoshì 四時纂要校釋, Nóngyè, 1981). Hán È’s precise lifedates are not on record; Miáo Qǐyù demonstrated from the Xīn Tángshū “Zǎixiàng shìxì biǎo” 宰相世系表 (juàn 73) that Hán È was great-great-grandson of Hán Sī 韓思 (elder brother of the Xuán-zōng-era chancellor Hán Xiū 韓休), via Hán Sī’s son Hán Qiàn 韓倩 and grandson Hán Dí 韓滌 (Hénán bīngcáo cānjūn). This genealogical depth places his floruit conventionally at the very end of the Táng or early Five Dynasties, c. 900. CBDB lists him at id 33249 without lifedates. The Sìkù compilers’ doubts about the Suìhuá jìlì — that it cites Sū È’s Dùyáng zábiān 杜陽雜編 and Wáng Dìngbǎo’s Zhìyán 摭言, both authors holding jìnshì degrees in the very last years of the Táng, and that the work refers prospectively to “the Táng era” — are not necessarily marks of forgery: a Hán È writing in the Wǔdài could naturally treat the Táng as past, and citation of late-Táng jìnshì authors is then unproblematic.