Shàngshū shuō 尚書說

Discourses on the Documents by 黃度 (zhuàn 撰)

About the work

A late-Southern-Sòng running commentary on the Shàngshū 尚書 (KR1b0001) in 7 juǎn, by Huáng Dù 黃度 of Xīnchāng (1138–1213). The work is a “discourse” (shuō 說) rather than a phrase-by-phrase gloss: Huáng formally builds on the Kǒng Ān’guó 孔安國 zhuàn 傳, but uses its scaffolding to deliver large meditations on the patterns of dynastic rise and fall and on the moral-administrative imperatives of zhízhōng jiànjí 執中建極 (“hold to the mean, establish the ultimate”). It belongs intellectually to the Yǒngjiā 永嘉 statecraft milieu — Huáng was friends with Yè Shì 葉適 and Chén Fùliáng 陳傅良, and his classical writings circulated within that network — though his social and official ties to Zhū Xī 朱熹 keep the book on the margin of the Lǐxué 理學 mainstream.

Tiyao

Imperially Authorized Sìkù Quánshū. Classics, division 2. Shàngshū shuō. Books-class.

Précis. Your servants etc. respectfully submit: the Shàngshū shuō in seven juǎn is by Huáng Dù of the Sòng. Dù, zì Wénshū, was a man of Xīnchāng. He passed the Shàoxīng jìnshì and served as yùshǐ 御史; he impeached Hán Tuōzhòu. Under the Níngzōng emperor he rose by successive offices to Lǐbù shàngshū and Lóngtúgé xuéshì, and after his death received the canonical name Xuānxiàn. Dù was a tireless and dedicated scholar of the classics, working without flagging into old age; on the Yìjīng, the Shī, and the Zhōulǐ he produced compositions of his own, but it is the present compilation that is the most outstanding of the set. Chén Zhènsūn says: “In Dù’s later years, when he was holding the military command over the JiāngHuái, his writing did not stop; whenever he hit upon a new meaning he would, in mornings or in the dead of night, knock at the doors of his friends’ studios to set it out for them” — one can see how diligent his scholarship was. In daily life he was on good terms with Master Zhū [Xī], with Yè Shì, with Chén Fùliáng and others, and his Zhōulǐ and Shī shuō were both publicly praised by Shì. Although the present compilation only takes the Kǒng zhuàn and elaborates upon it, when it points to the records of the rise and fall, ordering and disordering of the Three Dynasties, and brings out the import of “holding to the mean and establishing the ultimate,” all of it grasps the heart of the principle deeply — these are not the productions of a mere phrase-and-clause classicist. Respectfully submitted, Qiánlóng 45 / 1780, first month.

— Director-General, Jì Yún 紀昀, Lù Xīxióng 陸錫熊, Sūn Shìyì 孫士毅. — Director of Final Collation, Lù Fèichí 陸費墀.

(The tíyào spells Hán Tuōzhòu’s name as 韓侘胄; the conventional form is 韓侂胄. Preserved here as a typographical slip in the source.)

Abstract

Huáng Dù 黃度 (1138–1213) wrote the Shàngshū shuō in his late maturity: Chén Zhènsūn’s 陳振孫 Zhízhāi shūlù jiětí 直齋書錄解題 places the actual writing during his service as zhìkǔn 制閫 (military commissioner) over the JiāngHuái 江淮 frontier — i.e. during the Kāixī 開禧 (1205–1207) SòngJīn military crisis and its aftermath. Since Huáng died in 1213, and his most active period of classical writing falls in the years after his impeachment of Hán Tuōzhòu (active around 1195–1207), a defensible composition window for the work is roughly 1190–1213, with the bulk of the actual drafting in the first decade of the thirteenth century. The catalog metadata’s lifedates (1138–1213) match CBDB id 24717 and the standard dictionaries.

The book is small (7 juǎn) but characteristic: it does not undertake a comprehensive jíjiě 集解 of earlier opinion, but takes the Kǒng Ān’guó zhuàn 孔傳 as its baseline scaffolding and “develops” (fāmíng 發明) it. The substantive payload is concentrated in two recurring concerns — the etiology of dynastic xīngshuāi zhìluàn 興衰治亂 (“rise and fall, order and disorder”) and the imperial-political theology of zhízhōng jiànjí 執中建極 — both of which place the work in the same statecraft register as Yè Shì 葉適 (1150–1223) and Chén Fùliáng 陳傅良 (1141–1203), the two leading Yǒngjiā 永嘉 thinkers with whom Huáng Dù had close ties. The Sìkù compilers (in their submission of 1780) judged the book “no mere production of a phrase-and-clause classicist,” locating its value precisely in this practical-statecraft register.

The work is the most prominent surviving piece of Huáng Dù’s classical œuvre. His parallel commentaries on the Zhōulǐ (Zhōulǐ shuō 周禮說) and the Shī jīng (Shī shuō 詩說) are also extant in the Sìkù; both were endorsed by Yè Shì in his lifetime.

Translations and research

No substantial Western-language translation of the Shàngshū shuō is known. For Huáng Dù’s place in the Yǒngjiā 永嘉 statecraft milieu, see Hoyt Cleveland Tillman, “Encyclopedias, Polymaths, and Tao-hsüeh Confucians” in Études chinoises 9.1 (1990); and the entry in Yáng Tiānbǎo 楊天保, Yǒngjiā xuépài yánjiū 永嘉學派研究 (Shanghai: Shànghǎi gǔjí, 2007). For Huáng’s Zhōulǐ shuō see Lái Yǐnglián 賴茵蓮, Huáng Dù Zhōulǐ shuō yánjiū 黃度周禮說研究 (M.A. thesis, Tāiwān 國立中央大學, 2003).

Other points of interest

The Sìkù tíyào preserves the typographical slip 韓侘胄 for the better-known form 韓侂胄 — flagged here per local convention.