聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

緇衣集傳

5 min read

Text ID
KR1d0065
Date
1638–1638
Dynasty
明

Zīyī jízhuàn 緇衣集傳

Collected Tradition on the Black Robes

by 黃道周 (撰)

About the work

A late-Míng monograph commentary on the Zīyī 緇衣 (“Black Robes”) chapter of the Lǐjì KR1d0052 in 4 juàn by Huáng Dàozhōu 黃道周, composed in 1638 (Chóngzhēn 11) at the imperial-lecture tent and presented to the throne — one of his five parallel Lǐjì-chapter monographs of that year (with KR1d0062, KR1d0063, KR1d0064, KR1d0066). Like the parallel Biǎojì and Fāngjì jízhuàn, the work divides the Zīyī (originally a single chapter) into 23 chapters of Huáng’s own creation — Fēn bù fán 分不煩, Xián fú 咸服, Sūn xīn 孫心, Mín biǎo 民表, Hǎo rén 好仁, Wáng yán 王言, Jìn xíng 禁行, Dé yī 德壹, Yī dé 壹德, Shì hòu 示厚 etc. — and gathers some 200+ historical citations on hǎo wù (likes and dislikes), criminal-and-reward, and statecraft to anchor each section. The Sìkù tíyào judges this the most successful of the five parallel monographs: its jiànjiè (instruction-and-warning) is well-targeted against the favouritism-and-faction politics of the late-Míng imperial court.

Tiyao

We respectfully submit that Zīyī jízhuàn in four juan was composed by Huáng Dàozhōu of the Míng. [Huáng] Dàozhōu has Sānyì dòngjǐ, separately catalogued. This book takes the Zīyī one piān, each-and-every is set as a chapter-rubric: Fēn bù fán one, Xián fú two, Sūn xīn three, Mín biǎo four, Hǎo rén five, Wáng yán six, Jìn xíng seven, Dé yī eight, Yī dé nine, Shì hòu ten, Bù láo eleven, Chéng jiào twelve, Zhōng jìng thirteen, Qīn xián fourteen, Shèn nì fifteen, Tǐ quán sixteen, Yī lèi seventeen, Hǎo zhèng eighteen, Jiān zhù nineteen, Dé huì twenty, Shēng chéng twenty-one, Chéng xìn twenty-two, Héng dé twenty-three. The creating-and-establishing of rubrics is similar to the Rúxíng, Biǎojì, Fāngjì [pattern].

Examining Zhèng Kāngchéng’s saying: “the Zīyī piān — its goodness in fondness-for-the-worthy is thoroughgoing — therefore [the recorder] recounted the cited Shī and made it the title.” [Huáng] Dàozhōu’s Jízhuàn is the imperial-lecture-tent presented version; intent at borrowing [the chapter] for fěngjiàn (allusive remonstrance) — therefore on the matters of hǎowù gōngsī (the public-private quality of likes-and-dislikes), and réncái xiézhèng (the deviousness or correctness of personnel) — three-times-over [he] devotes attention. [He] himself once stated: “this zhuàn slightly gathers from the canon-and-history what relates to hǎowù, xíngshǎng (punishment-and-reward), and the great points of zhìdào (statecraft) — in total over two hundred items — appending to the piān.” On the jīngjì shùwù (statecraft-and-administrative affairs) detail-rubrics, although there are unresolved [points], on the source of the ruler-mind’s hǎowù in its essential-rubric, down to the past-and-present zhìluàn shèngshuāi (govern-disorder, rise-decline) reasons, [the work] also roughly is comprehensive-and-prepared. Further this compilation originally takes Zīyī as the rubric, while the Zhèng annotation takes fondness-for-the-worthy as the explanation. [Huáng] Dàozhōu’s book — although broadly citing historical events — its central pointing returns to what is in fact also not contrary to ancient training.

Respectfully revised and submitted, third month of the forty-fourth year of Qiánlóng [1779].

General Compilers: Jǐ Yún 紀昀, Lù Xīxióng 陸錫熊, Sūn Shìyì 孫士毅. General Reviser: Lù Fèichí 陸費墀.

Abstract

The Zīyī jízhuàn is the third in Huáng Dàozhōu’s series of Lǐjì chapter-rubric monographs and centres on the political-moral question of imperial-favouritism (hǎowù gōngsī) — a topic of urgent practical relevance in the late-Chóngzhēn court, where Huáng was struggling against the favouritist circle around the eunuch establishment. The Sìkù tíyào gives its strongest endorsement of the five-monograph series to this volume: while flagging the chapter-rubric system as Huáng’s own innovation, the editors accept the Zhèng Xuán reading of the Zīyī as concerned with “hǎo xián” (fondness for the worthy) and judge Huáng’s elaboration of this into a 200-passage anthology of historical hǎowù xíngshǎng zhìdào cases as substantively well-grounded.

The work’s political-practical orientation is clearer here than in any of the other four monographs: the reader is offered an annotated brief on imperial hǎowù (likes-and-dislikes), centred on the question of how a sovereign’s personal predilections shape the ascent of officials and the rise-or-fall of dynasties. Huáng’s late-Míng audience — at the jīngyán tent of Chóngzhēn — would have read the work as a diagnostic-and-prescriptive treatise on the imperial favouritism that was destroying the dynasty; the modern reader can read it as Huáng’s prescient warning to a court that would fall six years later.

The dating 1638 is fixed by Huáng’s official position in that year; the work shares its compositional moment with the parallel four monographs and its jīngyán presentation context.

Translations and research

  • Lynn A. Struve, The Southern Ming, 1644–1662 (Yale UP, 1984) — biographical material on Huáng Dàozhōu’s late-Míng career.
  • Míng shǐ 明史 j. 255 (biography of Huáng Dàozhōu).
  • Edward L. Shaughnessy, Rewriting Early Chinese Texts (SUNY Press, 2006) — discusses the early-history Zīyī (the Guōdiàn 郭店 and Shàng-bó 上博 manuscript versions) — important context for any modern reception of the Zīyī tradition that Huáng could not have known.
  • Pèng Lín 彭林, Sānlǐ yánjiū rùmén 三禮研究入門 (Fùdàn dàxué chūbǎnshè, 2012) — covers the late-Míng Lǐjì commentary tradition.

Other points of interest

The Zīyī chapter itself has acquired enormous additional scholarly importance in the late twentieth and twenty-first century with the discovery of pre-Qín bamboo-strip manuscript versions at Guōdiàn (郭店楚簡, ca. 300 BCE) and in the Shàngbó museum collection — establishing it as one of the earliest datable Confucian texts and predating its incorporation into the Lǐjì by several centuries. Huáng Dàozhōu’s late-Míng moral-political reading retains its interest as a witness to the active reception of the chapter at one of the late-Míng court’s most fraught political moments, but the modern philological situation around the Zīyī has fundamentally shifted.

Graph View

Backlinks