Huángdūn wénjí 篁墩文集

Bamboo-Mound Literary Collection by 程敏政 (撰)

About the work

The self-edited zǒngjí (complete works) of Chéng Mǐnzhèng 程敏政 (1445–1499), Kèqín 克勤, hào Huángdūn 篁墩, of Xiūníng 休寧 (Huīzhōu). 93 juǎn of prose, , and several thousand poems. Chéng was the precocious shéntóng of his generation — recommended at ten, ranked #2 jìnshì (yījiǎ èr míng) in Chénghuà 2 (1466), and reached Lǐbù yòu shìláng 禮部右侍郎 in the Hóngzhì period; he ended in disgrace, impeached by jǐshìzhōng Huà Chāng 華㫤 over the Hóngzhì 12 (1499) metropolitan-examination leakage case and forced from office. He was son-in-law of the dominant Tiānshùn–Chénghuà Senior Grand Secretary Lǐ Xián 李賢 (李賢, KR4e0104) and edited his father-in-law’s Gǔráng jí as well as the Tángshì sān xiānshēng jí (KR4e0097) and the Lèibógǎo of Yuè Zhèng (KR4e0109). Independently he is the author of the major Lǐxué compilation Xīnjīng fùzhù 心經附註 (an annotated Hǎnjīng of Zhēn Déxiù) and the influential reference work Dào yī biān 道一編. The Huángdūn wénjí is Chéng’s own redaction; a 25-juǎn selection Huángdūn wéncuì 篁墩文粹 was made by his clansman-junior Chéng Zēng 程曽 with much cutting.

Tiyao

Huángdūn wénjí in 93 juǎn — by Chéng Mǐnzhèng of the Míng. Mǐnzhèng, Kèqín, native of Xiūníng. At a little over ten years of age, called for audience as a prodigy and tested with a Auspicious-Snow poem and one jīngyì piece; by edict allowed to read in the Hànlínyuàn, on government stipend. Chénghuà bǐngxū (1466) by the one-rank, second-name (yījiǎ èrmíng) jìnshì, appointed Hànlínyuàn biānxiū; ascended to Lǐbù yòu shìláng. In Hóngzhì 12 (1499), as administrator of the huìshì examination, he was impeached and removed by jǐshìzhōng Huà Chāng 華㫤; on death, posthumously raised to Lǐbù shàngshū. His record is given in Míngshǐ, Wényuàn zhuàn. The Míng wénhéng and Xīnān wénxiàn zhì that he compiled are separately catalogued. Mǐnzhèng’s learning is broad and penetrating; his writings have substantial roots, not the kind of yóután wúgēn (floating-talk-without-root) work. But his talent being high and his temper firm, he looked down on all things, so his arguments could not always avoid being piānbó (one-sided and patchy): such as memorialising to kǎozhèng sìdiǎn (verify the sacrificial canon) and wanting to remove Zhèng Kāngchéng from his hometown sacrifices; or discussing the Five Phases and wanting to substitute zào (cooking-hearth) for one of the phases — such positions are in propriety wèi yǔn (not allowable). Again, Xīnān Huángdūn 黃墩 was the residence of Jìn Xīnān grand administrator Huáng Jī 黃積; his descendants resided there over generations, hence the name Huáng (黃 = yellow / surname Huáng). From Luó Yuàn’s Xīnān zhì down through the Zhūzǐ wénjí, all the records agree. Mǐnzhèng yet claimed that 黃 was originally the character 篁 (bamboo) and was changed because of Huáng Cháo (the Táng rebel) — and so re-called it Huángdūn 篁墩, wrote a for it, and used it for his own hào. This claim is dùzhuàn wújī (fabricated, without basis) — also stepping into the practice of dàyán qīshì (grand-talk deceiving the age). Other times when adducing precedents, he often relied on his comprehensive command and did not check in detail — so there are many slips. The collection has several thousand poems, also mostly shuàiyì (offhand) and rather lacking in jǐngcè (warning-strike, well-honed lines). However, in the middle of the Míng, shìdàfū were extravagantly talking xìngmìng (nature-and-destiny), with the disease daily flowing into kōngshū (empty-and-careless). Mǐnzhèng alone, with broad learning and powerful talent, gāoshì kuòbù (looked high, walked broad); his philological work that is jīngdàng (essentially correct) is much to be taken. He must count as crown of his age; one must not discard him entirely on grounds of fánwú (redundant-overgrowth). Mǐnzhèng separately had Huángdūn wéncuì in 25 juǎn, compiled by his clansman-junior Chéng Zēng, with much cutting away. This (Wénjí) is his own self-edited complete collection. Compiled and presented in the second month of Qiánlóng 44 (1779). Chief Compilers: Jì Yún, Lù Xīxióng, Sūn Shìyì. General Editor: Lù Fèichí.

Abstract

Chéng Mǐnzhèng’s career inhabits two of the most explosive faction-struggles of the mid-Míng. First, as son-in-law of 李賢 (KR4e0104), he sat squarely inside the Tiānshùn / Chénghuà Lǐ Xián network that the Sìkù documents through this division — the same Lǐ Xián who banished Yè Shèng, Yuè Zhèng (KR4e0109), Luó Lún (KR4e0124), Hán Yōng (KR4e0107), and Zhāng Níng (KR4e0114). Chéng’s editorial work — Gǔráng jí (Lǐ Xián), KR4e0097 Wúgāng jí (Táng Wénfèng), KR4e0109 Lèibógǎo (Yuè Zhèng) — is the central documentary glue of that network. Second, his own ruin in Hóngzhì 12 (1499) — the metropolitan-examination question-leakage case, where the impeachment by jǐshìzhōng Huà Chāng 華㫤 forced him from office days before he died — is the most famous Míng examination-scandal of its decade and the proximate occasion for the Sìkù judgement of his “high talent and contrary temper”.

The Sìkù judgement is unusually two-edged. On the one hand the editors single out Chéng’s huāngtán on the Huángdūn place-name (his fabricated etymology of his own hào, claiming Huáng Cháo as the reason for the orthographic shift) as dùzhuàn wújī — “fabricated without basis”, dàyán qīshì — “grand-talk deceiving the age”; on the other, they explicitly preserve him as yīshí zhī guānmiǎn — the crown of his age — and as the principal Lǐxué learned exception to the empty xìngmìng chatter of mid-Míng shìdàfū. This makes the work a documentary anchor for both the Hóng-zhì-era classical-philology revival and the Sìkù editors’ programmatic distrust of mid-Míng Wángxué-precursor speculation.

The 原序 (original preface) by Lǐ Dōngyáng 李東陽 is dated Zhèngdé 2 / dīngmǎo (1507), seven years after Chéng’s death, occasioning posthumous publication by Chéng’s son Chéng Xūn 程壎 (Jin-yī-wèi qiānhù). Catalog meta dates of 1445–1499 are confirmed by CBDB id 29602.

Translations and research

  • L. Carrington Goodrich and Chaoying Fang, eds., Dictionary of Ming Biography 1368–1644. New York: Columbia UP, 1976: notice of Chéng Mǐn-zhèng.
  • Wilkinson, Chinese History: A New Manual, §28 (Míng bié-jí) and §31.4 (Míng Lǐ-xué).
  • Benjamin A. Elman, A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China. Berkeley: California UP, 2000 — on the Hóng-zhì 12 (1499) leakage case.
  • Míng shǐ j. 286 (Wén-yuàn 2) — Chéng Mǐn-zhèng biography.

Other points of interest

The Huángdūn place-name controversy — Chéng’s claim that the original name was 篁墩 (Bamboo-Mound) and that huáng 黃 (yellow) was a substitution made under the post-Huáng-Cháo Táng — is one of the cleanest Sìkù-flagged cases of kǎozhèng failure in a mid-Míng biéjí tradition that prided itself on philological rigor. The fact that the Sìkù editors call out the etymological fabrication, yet still rank Chéng as crown of his age, is a documentary mark of how the editors weighed Lǐxué erudition against ad-hoc speculation.