Rénzhāi zhízhǐ 仁齋直指

Rénzhāi’s Direct Pointers by 楊士瀛 (Yáng Shìyíng, Dēngfù, hào Rénzhāi, fl. 1264, 南宋); 朱崇正 (Zhū Chóngzhèng, Zōngrú, fl. 1550, 明) — Jiājìng-period supplementer

About the work

A late-Southern-Sòng comprehensive medical treatise in 26 juan / 79 categorical entries, completed in Jǐngdìng jiǎzǐ (1264) — Yáng Shìyíng’s mature synthesis of the Sòng medical canon. The work is paired in the SKQS recension with Yáng’s earlier Shānghán lèishū 傷寒類書 (7 juan, completed before the Zhízhǐ) — the two works together representing Yáng Shìyíng’s principal medical œuvre. The work covers the major disease-pattern categories from internal medicine through women’s medicine, pediatrics, surgery, and emergency medicine; each entry presents a synthetic discussion of the condition followed by carefully selected prescriptions. Yáng’s earlier works (the Huórén zǒngkuò 活人總括, the Yīng’ér zhǐyào 嬰兒指要, and the pulse-treatise) were criticized as “self-promotion” by his contemporaries; his preface to the Zhízhǐ — defending his persistence in writing despite criticism — is one of the more candid late-Sòng physician self-statements. The Míng physician Zhū Chóngzhèng’s 1550 (Jiājìng gēngxū) Jiājìng reprint adds supplementary entries under each chapter (the fùyí 附遺 sections) and is the SKQS base text. Foū Qǐn 佘鋟’s preface in the Jiājìng print refers to a “28-juan, 79-entry” structure; the SKQS editors note that the present text is in 26 juan, with the discrepancy being a transcriptional error in Foū Qǐn’s preface.

Tiyao

Rénzhāi zhízhǐ, 26 juan, with Shānghán lèishū 7 juan; both by Yáng Shìyíng of the Sòng. Shìyíng, Dēngfù, hào Rénzhāi, was a man of Fúzhōu; his career-record cannot be examined. At the head is his own preface dated Jǐngdìng jiǎzǐ (1264) — jiǎzǐ is Jǐngdìng 5; the next year is Dùzōng Xiánchún 1, so this is a late-Sòng man.

This base copy is the Jiājìng gēngxū (1550) reprint, with Foū Qǐn’s preface saying “the Zhízhǐ is divided into 28 juan, 79 entries”. Examining: the 79-entry count agrees with the preface but the actual book has 26 juan only. Jiāo Hóng’s Guóshǐ jīngjí zhì records this work also as 26 juan — so the preface text has a transcriptional error.

Yáng Shìyíng’s original was titled Rénzhāi zhízhǐ; the entries marked fùyí (附遺) at the end of each chapter were added by Zhū Chóngzhèng of the Míng Jiājìng period as continuations. Zhū’s was Zōngrú, of Huīzhōu — the printer-editor of this very recension. Jiāo Hóng’s Zhì gives the title as Rénzhāi zhízhǐ fùyí fāng (with “fùyí”), but only attributes Yáng Shìyíng — combining the appended material with the original under one author. This too is a small error.

The Shānghán lèishū 7 juan is not recorded in Jiāo Hóng’s Zhì. According to Yáng Shìyíng’s own preface to the Zhízhǐ, it was completed earlier than the Zhízhǐ. This recension, smaller in juan-count, was therefore printed afterward. The juan-headers also state “Zhū Chóngzhèng appended fùyí”, but examining the entire compilation: each entry’s text flows continuously without any separately-marked “fùyí”. Only juan 1’s Huórén zhèngzhì fù 活人證治賦 is followed by a Sītiān zàiquán tú 司天在泉圖, Wǔyùn liùqì tú 五運六氣圖, and Shānghán màifǎ zhǐzhǎng tú 傷寒脈法指掌圖, with one (appended) marker on the heading. Perhaps because this one juan has fùyí, the title-line was extended to all 7 juan; or perhaps because the Zhízhǐ has fùyí, the title-line was extended to this work as well. Both possibilities; the Sòng base print no longer survives, and we cannot now verify. Better to leave the doubt as doubt.

(Respectfully verified, 5th month of Qiánlóng 42 [1777]. Chief Compilers Jì Yún, Lù Xīxióng, Sūn Shìyì; Chief Collator Lù Fèichí.)

Abstract

Composition window: 1264/1264, the date of Yáng Shìyíng’s preface to the Zhízhǐ. The companion Shānghán lèishū was completed earlier (probably in the 1240s–1250s, but no precise date is recoverable).

The work’s significance:

(a) The mature late-Sòng synthesis of the medical canon: Yáng Shìyíng’s Rénzhāi zhízhǐ is the major late-Sòng synthetic medical compendium between Chén Yán’s Sānyīn fāng (1174) and the YuánMíng comprehensive medical encyclopedias. Yáng’s editorial method — synthetic discussion plus carefully selected prescriptions — became the standard format for late-imperial Chinese medical-comprehensive writing.

(b) The earlier specialized works as preliminaries: Yáng Shìyíng’s Huórén zǒngkuò (general medical synthesis), Yīng’ér zhǐyào (pediatrics), and pulse-treatise represent a single physician’s systematic specialization-and-synthesis program — culminating in the Zhízhǐ. The trajectory parallels modern medical-monograph publishing.

(c) The Shānghán lèishū companion: a major Southern-Sòng Shānghán commentary, in 7 juan, paired with the Zhízhǐ in the SKQS recension. Together they represent Yáng Shìyíng’s full medical œuvre.

(d) The Zhū Chóngzhèng Jiājìng fùyí supplementations: a Míng-period editorial intervention that became the SKQS-canonical form of the work. The SKQS editors’ careful disentanglement of Yáng’s original text from Zhū’s appendices (acknowledging that Shānghán lèishū’s fùyí are largely confined to a single juan, and the title-line attribution is mechanical) is methodologically careful.

The Huórén zhèngzhì fù 活人證治賦 in juan 1 of the Shānghán lèishū is one of the more interesting late-Sòng poetic-medical compositions: a (rhapsody) on the systematic recognition-and-treatment of cold-damage symptoms, intended as a mnemonic-pedagogical aid.

Translations and research

  • No substantial Western secondary translation of this specific work.
  • Goldschmidt, Asaf. The Evolution of Chinese Medicine: Song Dynasty, 960–1200, London: Routledge, 2009 (broader Sòng synthesis context).
  • Mǎ Jìxīng 馬繼興, Zhōng-yī wénxiàn xué 中醫文獻學, Shànghǎi: Shànghǎi Kēxué Jìshù Chūbǎnshè, 1990 (entry on the Rénzhāi zhí-zhǐ).
  • Liào Yùqún 廖育群, Yīxué yǔ chuántǒng wénhuà 醫學與傳統文化, Tianjin: Bǎihuā Wényì, 2002 (chapter on late-Sòng medical synthesis).

Other points of interest

The Sītiān zàiquán tú 司天在泉圖 and Wǔyùn liùqì tú 五運六氣圖 in juan 1 of the Shānghán lèishū are among the more accessible late-Sòng diagrammatic representations of the Sùwèn’s seven-great-treatises cosmological-pathological framework. Their preservation in this work is a useful witness for the late-Sòng pedagogical tradition of yùnqì doctrine.

The SKQS editors’ interpretive caution — “it is better to leave the doubt as doubt” (姑疑以𫝊疑可矣) — is one of the more attractive features of mid-Qīng philological method as practiced by the Sìkù compilers.