聞分館君 Ask BunKanKun

女科秘要

4 min read

Text ID
KR3ei020
Date
1793–1793
Dynasty
清

Nǚkē mìyào 女科秘要

The Secret Essentials of Women’s Medicine attributed to 蕭山竹林寺僧 (the Monks of Bamboo-Grove Monastery at Xiāoshān); transcribed by 吳煜 Wú Yù of Cháchá 茶垞, with prefatorial transmission via 陳秉元 Chén Bǐngyuán

About the work

An eight-juǎn gynecological compendium of the Bamboo-Grove-Monastery (Zhúlínsì 竹林寺) gynecology tradition of Xiāoshān 蕭山 (Zhèjiāng), preserved through clandestine private transcription. The text is organised by topical mén with detailed case-presentation: each entry presents a numbered case-vignette (lìàn 立案) of a specific gynecological condition with the prescribed formula given. The preface explicitly states that the work’s distinctive style is “tiáofēn lǚxī, lìàn yòngfāng, yǔ shì bùtóng” 條分縷晰，立案用方，與世不同 (“itemised and analytically divided, formula given case-by-case, unlike the world’s [other works]”). This case-based presentation distinguishes it from the more systematic-treatise gynecologies of 武之望 Wǔ Zhīwàng or 王肯堂 Wáng Kěntáng.

Prefaces

The KR hxwd _000.txt carries two prefaces, both narrating the work’s transmission:

  1. The first xù 敘 (anonymous, or by the same Wú Yù 吳煜 acting as preface-writer for an intermediary). The preface opens with a 蘇軾 Sū Dōngpō tag — “藥雖進於醫手，方多傳於古人” (“Though medicine comes through the physician’s hand, formulae are mostly transmitted from the ancients”) — and narrates that the Bamboo-Grove-Monastery monks famously refused to share their secret formulary; the preface-writer’s friend 陳秉元 Chén Bǐngyuán had a grandfather who had lodged at the monastery and surreptitiously copied “several juǎn” of the secret manuscript, which Chén kept private. The preface-writer, on a visit to Chén’s residence at the Qīngdàoqiáo 清道橋 in the prefectural city, took the manuscript from Chén’s cabinet while Chén was out and copied it over a few days, returning the original without Chén’s knowledge. The preface-writer disclaims medical expertise and asks “those skilful in gynecology” to verify and correct the manuscript.

  2. The second xù 敘 by 吳煜 Wú Yù of Cháchá 茶垞, dated Qiánlóng guǐchǒu mèngdōng wànghòu èrrì 乾隆癸丑孟冬望後二日 = the 17th day of the tenth lunar month of Qiánlóng 58 (= late 1793), “written at the Qīnghuī shūwū” (Hall of Pure Brightness Studio). Wú Yù records his childhood acquaintance with the Bamboo-Grove gynecological tradition: his sister-in-law, after multiple miscarriages, was successfully cured by Bamboo-Grove medicines fetched by his elder brother; the monks gave only sealed medicine packets, not formulae. Wú narrates that the present manuscript came to him from his in-law 樊元圃 Fán Yuánpǔ, who asked him to collate it on the grounds that Wú was knowledgeable in pharmacopoeia.

Abstract

The work is one of the late-Qiánlóng private-circulation editions of the Bamboo-Grove-Monastery gynecological corpus, transmitted through a grandfather → friend → friend chain of clandestine transcription (Chén Bǐngyuán’s grandfather → Chén Bǐngyuán → the first prefacer; and Fán Yuánpǔ → Wú Yù as a parallel chain). Both prefatorial narratives explicitly identify the source-text as a stolen-and-copied Bamboo-Grove monastery manuscript, providing valuable documentary evidence for the monastery’s pharmaceutical secrecy practices and the textual leakage that produced the surviving Qīng Zhúlínsì nǚkē corpus (compare KR3ei013 Níngkūn mìjí, KR3ei026 Zhúlín nǚkē zhèngzhì, KR3ei046 Zhúlínsì nǚkē mìfāng).

The catalog meta records no author and the dynasty as 清; the firm 1793 prefatorial dating gives an exact notBefore / notAfter. The work has been widely reprinted in Qīng popular medical book markets under the title Nǚkē mìyào; the hxwd recension preserves the 1793 transcription with the two transmission-prefaces intact.

Translations and research

  • Yi-Li Wu, “The Bamboo Grove Monastery and Popular Gynecology in Qing China.” Late Imperial China 21.1 (2000): 41–76 — the foundational English-language study of the lineage, including discussion of the manuscript-transmission pattern that produced texts like the Nǚkē mìyào.
  • Yi-Li Wu, Reproducing Women: Medicine, Metaphor, and Childbirth in Late Imperial China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.
  • No dedicated standalone study of the Nǚkē mìyào located.

Other points of interest

The dual prefatorial transmission-narratives are a remarkable Qīng-period documentary record of clandestine medical-manuscript circulation. They explicitly thematise the ethical tension between (a) the monks’ commercial-pharmaceutical secrecy, (b) the prefacers’ Confucian humanitarian conviction that “anything that helps people should not remain hidden” (物苟有濟於人，不容終秘), and (c) the cousinship-betrayal involved in actually copying a friend’s privately held manuscript without permission. The texts thereby reveal one principal mechanism by which the Bamboo-Grove monastic medical tradition entered general Qīng popular medical literature.

Graph View

Backlinks